Beware the Restrictive Covenant

Hamilton residents dug up a 1935 land transfer agreement which placed a restrictive covenant on the land, in the hopes of forcing a Mississauga developer to halt/scale back development plans for the site.

The developer says, "As far as we’re concerned it doesn’t apply" -- such restrictions expire after 40 years.

True, but there are renewal provisions under the Act. The applicable section of the Registry Act more fully states:

Expiry of claims

113. (1) A claim that is still in existence on the last day of the notice period expires at the end of that day unless a notice of claim has been registered. R.S.O. 1990, c. R.20, s. 113 (1).

Notice of claim

(2) A person having a claim or a person acting on that person’s behalf, may register a notice of claim with respect to the land affected by the claim,

(a) at any time within the notice period for the claim; or

(b) at any time after the expiration of the notice period but before the registration of any conflicting claim of a purchaser in good faith for valuable consideration of the land. 2006, c. 34, s. 22 (4).

Source: Residents fight developer with 72-year-old document (Mississauga News)
Posted Sunday Oct 07

Interesting post. Thanks for sharing.

Post a comment

Temporarily disabled — coming soon!

ActiveRain Corp. is not responsible for the accuracy of the site's content (which is written by members of the ActiveRain Real Estate Network) and does not endorse the views of the real estate agents, mortgage brokers, and others listed here.

Powered by the ActiveRain Real Estate Network

© 2008 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved