
I was born and raised in Cherokee County, went to three different high schools in the county (divorce and redistricting), lived at home while attending Kennesaw State University, and now I own a business in the county as well owning 4 properties located in Cherokee. Many of my family members still live in the county (which may be the reason I moved to Cobb) and I am very proud to be from such a wonderful place. Yet lately, I have been embarrassed of Cherokee's elected officials for several reasons.
1. Placing private citizens responsible to control illegal immigration is wrong on many levels. Here is a great quote in regard to this issue from Jeff Dickerson of the Atlanta Business Chronicle:
"But private citizens, as taxpayers, are already bearing the brunt of this issue, paying for the services consumed by illegal immigrants. It's a double whammy to penalize them again for renting to illegals or hiring them.
Here's a thought: Since government created this problem, government ought to fix it. It ought not look to private citizens to do what it has been unable or unwilling to do."Sheriff Roger Garrison also had a good quote on the topic:
"We have to keep bed space in our jails for people we are afraid of, and find an alternate means of punishment for those persons we are just mad at," Garrison said. "And for the most part, we are just mad at the illegals.""2. Also, embarrassing is the fact that elected officials missed a golden opportunity to manage the impending growth of Cherokee County with wisdom and forethought. Even when reports from it's own departments suggest tremendous growth... Russ Sims, director of planning and forecasting for the Cherokee County School District, said "there are more than 2,300 houses in the county that are ready to be occupied, more than 5,100 lots prepped for construction and more than 13,100 undeveloped lots in neighborhoods where construction is underway. There also are more than 12,600 lots that are zoned for houses, but not yet under construction."
Sims added, "the school district is predicting both the county population and the student population will double by 2014."Yet county commissioners continue to embrace "dumb growth" policies by not working to approve "smart growth" projects, such as the 4,000+/- acre project known as "A Village in the Forest" proposed by Macauley Companies. Instead they ignore all of the benefits of a master planned community and instead embrace smaller piece-meal projects scattered around the county.
In a recent AJC article..."Macauley, who has built or is building three other Cherokee neighborhoods, released a statement via e-mail saying he is withdrawing the request to allow newly appointed planning commission members to get acclimated. He also wants a cooling off period.
"Perhaps a 'time out' period will lower the volume of the rhetoric and allow for a more rational assessment of the merits of our proposal," he said. His team will also review the proposal and try to meet the concerns expressed by residents."
I was most alarmed when reading the same AJC article to see the following...Commissioner Jim Hubbard said, "I am hoping he will come back with a plan with a little less density."Perhaps Mr. Hubbard should read the following advice from a growth planning expert:Hubbard said he hopes the county could use some local green space money to buy some of the property and preserve it as a county park. County voters approved up to $10 million from special purpose local option sales taxes in 2000 for buying green space and parks.
"It would not scare me, if we can detect a revenue stream, to go ahead and borrow the money and buy at least part of it," Hubbard said.
The executive director of the Urban Land's Institute's Atlanta chapter, Jeff DuFresne, said "When you look at the problems facing Atlanta - air quality, water quality, and traffic - the real challenge is the attitude toward change. People just see red when it comes to higher-density development, even though it may take cars off the street, use less land, improve the local tax base, and give mixed-use and housing options to residents. It can save taxpayers money."It wouldn't hurt Mr. Hubbard to save the county citizens tax dollars by just allowing Macauley to preserve the 1,500+ acres promised as undeveloped green space for the project "A Village in the Forest", not to mention the $80 Million toward infrastructure and $4+ billion of tax revenue. I love the irony in Mr. Hubbard's quote, "It would not scare me, if we can detect a revenue stream, to go ahead and borrow the money and buy at least part of it." But it would scare him to accept the 1,500 acres of land to be preserved by a developer using the developer's money instead of the county citizens?
The proposed plan features "Character Areas" which:
ActiveRain Corp. is not responsible for the accuracy of the site's content (which is written by members of the ActiveRain Real Estate Network) and does not endorse the views of the real estate agents, mortgage brokers, and others listed here.
Powered by the ActiveRain Real Estate Network
© 2012 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved