Here it comes, the avalanche of lawsuits because owners are claiming that they bought because they were promised one thing and then they delivered another.
Here is what I wrote in November 2006:
Here is what is going on now:
Apparently the condotel owners are not seeing the returns they are promised and are trying to do something about it. Just a little trip to the Las Vegas Convention & Visitor Authority's website could have saved a ton of money and heart ache for people who didn't understand that the amount of rooms (%wise) does not add up to the increase in visitor volume (%wise).
A good long term investment, the verdict is still out. An immediate return on your buck, HECK NO! Seriously, you probably would have received a better return buying a regular high rise condo on or near the strip, buy some cheap furniture from Ikea and straight out rent it out yourself.
ActiveRain Corp. is not responsible for the accuracy of the site's content (which is written by members of the ActiveRain Real Estate Network) and does not endorse the views of the real estate agents, mortgage brokers, and others listed here.
Powered by the ActiveRain Real Estate Network
© 2008 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
Renee, years back I was tempted on a few of occassions by friends to take the condotel plunge. We're talking 2003-2004'ish. Not sure how those investments would of panned out, but in view of this, I think I did the right thing in abondoning the idea.
On another note, what recourse do these "investors" really have anyway? They took a gamble and lost. What "promises" were made "in writing" to back up that claim? I would guess none.
You were right about NO promises in writing. Past performance does not guarantee future returns, eh?