![]() |
|
|
By Lester Tobias, Architect
ABSTRACT
In 2004 the City of Malibu began accepting and reviewing applications for building permits under the new LIP, written by the California Coastal Commission. This new planning code is much more restrictive than the old Municipal Zoning Code (the IZO). Its review process is significantly more time consuming and expensive than the previous code.
It was understood at the time that this new code would apply to all new residences, and most projects on bluffs and in ESHAs.
It was also clear at the time that many projects consisting of additions and remodels would be exempt from the LIP, and would be allowed to be reviewed under the municipal code. This process saved homeowners time and money.
At the same time, several conflicting sections, subsections, and definitions pertaining to exemptions were haphazardly inserted into the LIP.
Initially, the planning staff was amenable to the overarching exemption section of the LIP. This allowed for most homeowners to proceed with additions and remodels with relative certainty as to the timelines for permitting and cost of this permitting. It allowed for local architects and expediters to speak with some authority about what could and could not be done to existing homes.
Over the past 18 months, the planning staff has incrementally become less willing to exempt projects. Not only are they directing more and more projects out of the overarching exemption, they are reinterpreting portions of the LIP to essentially force every addition to obtain a coastal development permit. Specifically, they are focusing on what is commonly known as "the 50% rule". This has created noticeable hardship among homeowners, their architects and consultants.
WHERE'S THE BEEF?
Certain planning staff, planning commissioners, and council members accuse some local architects and builders of using the exemption rules to "game" the system. This complaint, however, does not hold up under further analysis. It is a FACT that any addition or remodel that can be built under the LIP is the EXACT SAME project that would be allowed under the municipal code. Setbacks are calculated the same way. Height restrictions are identical. The more restrictive ESHA maps are used. Variances require the same procedures.
What does occur, indeed, is that the more savvy architects and builders use the exemption rule to get projects built in a more timely and cost effective manner, and to be able to give clients an analysis of potential improvement scenarios with relative certainty. There is nothing unethical or illegal about this process.
As the permit process becomes more onerous, it becomes increasingly important for all Malibu homeowners and stakeholders to voice their opinions on this topic. Construction can play a major role in our State's economic recovery. If the ability to obtain a building permit becomes increasingly expensive and time consuming (for no good reason), a recovery will not only be delayed, but may in fact be jeopardized. In addition, it is just plain wrong for a planning department to capriciously create barriers to a reasonably speedy permit process.
EXEMPTED PROJECTS AND THE 50% RULE
There should be no real debate that a structure directly attached to the residence is an addition. Recently, the planning staff has been reviewing additions and remodels under a different subsection of the code. Specifically 13.4.2, entitled "Repair and Maintenance Activities." Subsection 13.4.2 (D) states, "Unless destroyed by natural disaster, the replacement of 50 percent or more of a single-family residence, (as measured by 50% of the exterior walls), ... is not repair and maintenance but instead constitutes a replacement structure requiring a coastal development permit."
This particular subsection seems to suffer from trying to over-regulate structures that have incurred exceptional, one time, damage. It should not be construed to refer to additions and remodels, yet it is being interpreted in just that fashion.
It is interesting to note that nowhere in the code or its definitions does "replacement structure" appear.
NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURES
Subsection 13.5.C states, "...demolition and/or reconstruction that results in replacement of more than 50 percent of non-conforming structures, ..., is not permitted unless such structures are brought into conformance with the policies and standards of the LCP.
If your house has a setback that was legal at the time it was built, but could not be located in the same place under the LIP, and you remove more than half of your existing exterior walls, you have to eliminate the part of your house that is non-conforming. In many cases, it means that you would have to knock your house down and reconstruct it within the new setbacks.
While it would be easy to classify most of the work done to these walls as "alterations" or "improvements" (thereby exempting the project), the planning staff is attempting to define "demolition and reconstruction" to include work as banal as adding a door or window. Imagine having a ‘50's ranch house, and wanting to open up the views by increasing the size and number of doors and windows. Under this type of definition, you would most likely be over the 50% wall limitation, and be forced to remove the non-conforming part of your house (this would most likely mean total demolition).
VOLUNTARY STRUCTURAL UPGRADES
THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A TYPICAL HOME IMPROVEMENT
WHAT TO DO?
Lester Tobias
TOBIAS ARCHITECTURE
22221 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90265
310.317.0507
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample letter Malibu residents can send to the Malibu City Council at 23815 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu:
Dear City Council Member,
As a Malibu homeowner, and member of the community, I write to you in opposition to the pending new limitations on the exemptions to remodels and additions from requiring a Coastal Development Permit. The additional time and cost associated with this type of permit adds yet another hurdle to the all ready unreasonable process we must endure to improve our homes (and add to the City's coffers).
I also understand that the homes most in need of improvements contain varying degrees of construction that, while legal when the homes were built, are now considered "nonconforming", and the requirement to obtain a coastal development permit would necessitate the removal of the non-conforming construction, adding further burden and cost where none had previously existed, and where no real harm is being done.
The last year has seen a drastic reduction in property values and the virtual elimination of construction lending. As a homeowner, any home improvement work I may consider in the future will, of prudence and necessity, be far more budget conscious than in the previous decade. The uncertainties brought on by the proposed new analysis of "the 50% rule" will potentially and involuntarily increase the scope of my project to a point where I may be forced to abandon it. This benefits no one, including our City.
After speaking with professionals regarding this issue, I am even more confused as to why the City would be entertaining this notion. It is apparent that exemption from a Coastal Development Permit does NOT allow anyone to build something that could not be built under a CDP. It does NOT exempt neighbor notification for projects above 18 feet in height, or for those requiring modifications, neighborhood standards, or variances.
It merely gives homeowners a simpler and less expensive process by which a building permit may be obtained. It requires less administrative time, and would continue to provide a bit of reasonableness in a historically overregulated segment of our community.
I would request that you would simply direct the Planning Department and the Building Department tofollow LIP subsection 13.4.1, and exempt all additions to existing residences as explicitly noted in that portion of the code. Failing this simple and direct approach, I request that you put this matter on the City Council's agenda as soon as possible for discussion and resolution.
Thank you very much.
![]() |
|
|
| Beachfront (as of Sept. 23, 2009) | Landside (as of Sept. 23, 2009) |
| # of Actives | Price Range | # of Actives | Price Range | ||
| SFR | 79 | $849,000 - $65,000,000 | SFR | 266 | $269,000 - $22,900,000 |
| Condos | 34 | $527,500 - $5,900,000 | Condos | 49 | $399,000 - $1,995,000 |
| Leases | 183 | $1,700 - $100,000 | Leases | 164 | $2,150 - $60,000 |
| Land | 7 | $198,500 - $13,500,000 | Land | 245 | $24,900 - $29,999,999 |
| AUGUST 2009 SALES / LEASES |
| SINGLE FAMILY - LANDSIDE |
| Address | LP | SP | BR | BA | SF | LSZ | YB |
| 1944 Corral Cyn. Rd. | $469,900 | $455,000 | 1 | 1 | 925 | 14,976 | 1927 |
| 3636 Seahorn Dr. | $1,159,000 | $1,100,000 | 4 | 2 | 2,061 | 6,386 | 1964 |
| 23308 W. Pompano St. | $1,295,000 | $1,295,000 | 4 | 3 | 2,704 | 28,850 | 1986 |
| 3702 Oceanhill Way | $1,295,000 | $1,050,000 | 4 | 2 | 2,061 | 6,839 | 1964 |
| 20485 Roca Chica Dr. | $1,299,000 | $1,199,000 | 3 | 3 | 1,972 | 12,358 | 1976 |
| 800 Crater Camp Dr. | $1,399,000 | $1,340,000 | 2 | 1 | 1,203 | 99,317 | 1956 |
| 20434 Roca Chica Dr. | $1,499,000 | $1,450,000 | 3 | 3 | 2,544 | 12,868 | 1966 |
| 6280 Paseo Canyon Dr. | $1,695,000 | $1,500,000 | 4 | 2.5 | 2,232 | 12,598 | 1962 |
| 21577 Rambla Vista Dr. | $2,050,000 | $1,850,000 | 4 | 3.5 | 2,794 | 5,497 | 2001 |
| 31800 Lobo Canyon Rd. | $2,250,000 | $2,050,000 | 4 | 4.5 | 4,949 | 1,751,983 | 1981 |
| 20773 Big Rock Dr. | $2,355,000 | $2,100,000 | 3 | 3 | 2,631 | 45,738 | 1957 |
| 6637 Zumirez Dr. | $2,400,000 | $2,200,000 | 4 | 2 | 1,900 | 22,499 | 1956 |
| 6305 Gayton Pl. | $2,795,000 | $2,425,000 | 5 | 5.5 | - | 48,351 | 2005 |
| 27605 Pacific Coast Hwy. | $3,052,000 | $2,850,000 | 5 | 7 | 6,058 | 33,745 | 2001 |
| 821 Caminio Colibri | $4,399,000 | $4,100,000 | 6 | 7 | 7,000 | 150,282 | 1972 |
| SINGLE FAMILY - LANDSIDE |
| Address | LP | SP | BR | BA | SF | LSZ | YB |
| 19308 Pacific Coast Hwy. | $1,775,000 | $1,650,000 | 2 | 2 | 1,191 | 1,237 | 1956 |
| 21360 Pacific Coast Hwy. | $5,995,000 | $5,040,000 | 3 | 2.75 | 1,868 | 6,856 | 1952 |
| CONDOS - LANDSIDE |
| Address | LP | SP | BR | BA | SF | LSZ | YB |
| 28314 Rey De Copas Ln. | $599,900 | $499,900 | 2 | 3 | 1,681 | - | 1974 |
| LEASES - LANDSIDE |
| Address | LP | SP | BR | BA | SF | LSZ | YB |
| 21361 Pacific Coast Hwy. #2 | $1,495 | $1,495 | 1 | 1 | - | 8,830 | 1963 |
| 7004 Birdview Ave. | $1,495 | $1,475 | 1 | 1 | 500 | 36,538 | - |
| 29502 Harvester Rd. | $2,100 | $2,100 | 1 | 1 | 1,200 | 53,579 | 1963 |
| 3709 Las Flores Cyn. Rd. #D | $2,100 | $1,900 | 2 | 1 | 1,296 | - | 1999 |
| 28711 Pacific Coast Hwy. #12 | $2,500 | $2,200 | 2 | 2 | 1,007 | 11,543 | 1988 |
| 23901 Civic Center Way #D-263 | $2,850 | $2,750 | 2 | 2 | 895 | 1,599 | 1972 |
| 18111 Coastline Dr. #3 | $2,950 | $2,900 | 2 | 2 | 1,200 | - | 1967 |
| 28282 Rey De Copas Ln. | $2,995 | $2,950 | 2 | 3 | 1,681 | 1,372 | 1974 |
| 28374 Rey De Copas Ln. | $2,995 | $2,995 | 2 | 3 | 1,681 | 1,350 | 1974 |
| 6452 Cavalleri Rd. | $3,475 | $3,450 | 3 | 2 | 1,540 | 2,239 | 1975 |
| 29221 Heathercliff Rd. #13 | $3,500 | $3,500 | 2 | 3 | 1,530 | 2,844 | 1980 |
| 3950 Las Flores Cyn. Rd. | $3,500 | $3,200 | 2 | 1 | 950 | 11,696 | 1923 |
| 6477 Zuma View Pl. #124 | $3,650 | $3,300 | 2 | 2.5 | 1,611 | 5,667 | 1993 |
| 29500 Heathercliff Rd.#95 | $3,700 | $3,500 | 3 | 3 | 2,100 | 4,000 | 1972 |
| 18111 Coastline Dr. #2 | $3,750 | $3,600 | 2 | 2 | 1,200 | - | 1967 |
| 28302 Rey De Copas Ln. | $3,900 | $3,900 | 3 | 3 | 1,639 | 2,957 | 1974 |
| 6780 Shearwater Ln. | $4,500 | $4,500 | 2 | 2.5 | 1,320 | 5,663 | 1975 |
| 1600 Monte Viento St. | $4,500 | $4,500 | 3 | 3 | 2,488 | $4,500 | 1985 |
| 6457 Zuma View Pl. #140 | $4,500 | $4,000 | 3 | 3 | 1,928 | 5,157 | 1998 |
| 29170 Rey De Copas Ln. | $4,600 | $4,200 | 3 | 3 | 1,681 | 2,957 | 1974 |
| 3601 Vista Pacifica #16 | $4,700 | $4,700 | 3 | 3.5 | 1,799 | 3,123 | 1987 |
| 6489 Cavalleri Rd. #310E | $4,800 | $4,800 | 3 | 3 | 2,057 | 5,283 | 1991 |
| 6787 Las Olas Way | $5,000 | $4,500 | 3 | 3 | 1,484 | 5,663 | 1975 |
| 6216 Paseo Canyon Dr. | $5,300 | $5,300 | 4 | 3 | 2,715 | 14,340 | 1962 |
| 6487 Cavalleri Rd. #227 | $5,400 | $5,400 | 2 | 3.5 | 2,438 | 5,283 | 1993 |
| 6205 Frondosa Dr. | $5,450 | $5,450 | 4 | 2.5 | 2,232 | 14,566 | 1962 |
| 20533 Little Rock Way | $5,900 | $5,300 | 3 | 2 | 1,327 | 16,509 | 1955 |
| 6487 Cavalleri Rd. #124C | $6,000 | $6,000 | 2 | 2 | 1,880 | 5,283 | 1993 |
| 210 Lorine Way | $6,250 | $6,250 | 3 | 4 | 3,910 | 68,820 | 1984 |
| 31721 Broad Beach Rd. | $6,500 | $5,500 | 3 | 3 | 1,565 | 8,089 | 1958 |
| 6489 Cavalleri Rd. #104C | $6,525 | $6,525 | 2 | 2 | 1,874 | 5,283 | 1991 |
| 6579 Wandermere Rd. | $6,800 | $6,600 | 3 | 2 | 2,765 | 48,352 | 1957 |
| 3897 Rambla Orienta | $6,950 | $8,500 | 2 | 2 | 2,262 | 4,556 | 1996 |
| 28910 Hampton Pl. | $7,500 | $7,500 | 3 | 3 | 2,956 | 17,201 | 2003 |
| LEASES - BEACHSIDE |
| Address | LP | SP | BR | BA | SF | LSZ | YB |
| 26664 Seagull Way #B106 | $2,475 | $2,475 | 1 | 1 | 696 | 1,690 | 1973 |
| 26668 Seagull Way #D202 | $2,500 | $2,500 | 1 | 1 | 664 | 1,690 | 1973 |
| 26664 Seagull Way #B113 | $2,600 | $2,600 | 1 | 1 | 739 | 1,690 | 1973 |
| 26668 Seagull Way #D203 | $2,850 | $2,850 | 1 | 1 | 664 | - | 1973 |
| 22860 Pacific Coast Hwy. #208 | $3,495 | $3,495 | 1 | 1 | - | 14,375 | 1955 |
| 29709 Zuma Bay Way | $3,750 | $3,400 | 3 | 3 | 1,584 | 5,663 | 1975 |
| 22828 Pacific Coast Hwy. #D | $3,750 | $4,250 | 1 | 1 | - | 9,148 | 1977 |
| 4900 Bunnie Ln. | $5,700 | $4,500 | 3 | 2 | 1,800 | 9,470 | 1962 |
| 27200 Escondido Beach Rd. | $6,500 | $6,300 | 2 | 2 | - | 9,579 | 1950 |
| 22824 Pacific Coast Hwy. | $8,000 | $7,200 | 3 | 3 | 1,928 | 7,200 | 1984 |
| 21938 Pacific Coast Hwy. | $20,000 | $18,000 | 4 | 5 | 3,056 | 7,836 | 1955 |
| 27218 Pacific Coast Hwy. | $25,000 | $25,000 | 2 | 3 | 2,107 | 8,712 | 1965 |
| 24212 Malibu Rd. | $45,000 | $45,000 | 2 | 2 | 1,781 | 5,700 | 1952 |
| 23446 Malibu Colony Rd. | $110,000 | $110,000 | 6 | 4.5 | 5,888 | 7,836 | - |
![]() |
|
|
$775,000 - This will get you a 1 bedroom, 1 bath condo on one of Carbon Beach's premiere condominum complexes, with heated pool, that is right on the sand. This is a top floor, end unit. This listing is presented by White House Properties (Dorothy Greene).

Three other units are listed for sale in the complex:
#5 - 2B/2B - $1,495,000 - Aprx. 1,156 sq ft.
#21 - 2B/2B - $1,600,000 - Aprx. 1.155 sq. ft.
Recently SOLD - #25 - $1,700,000. 2b/2B. Apx. 1,200 square feet.
For more info on Malibu condos, visit the following link:
http://www.4malibu.com/Nav.aspx/Page=http://idx.themls.com/BobbyLehmkuhl/includes/malibucondo.cfm
![]() |
|
|
| We are experienced Real Estate Short Sale Consultants and we have the knowledge, experience and resources to help guide and assist you in your short sale transaction process. |
|
A real estate short sale is when you owe more than your properties current value but you need to sell. In a typical situation, your mortgage lenders would require you to come in with the difference in the amount owed. A real estate short sale is where we negotiate with your lenders to accept a pay-off that is less than you currently owe and you do not have to pay the difference. Typically, lenders won't even consider a short sale if your payments are current. Lenders will be more agreeable in negotiation if your payments are in arrears. Plus, if you have cash assets, the lender might try to tap those accounts. Can a Short Sale Be Done on Multiple Mortgages? Absolutely. A mortgage short sale is not restricted to just one mortgage. In fact, most successful mortgage short sale cases are for homes with multiple mortgages on them. After all, most people are upside down on a mortgage because they have more than one mortgage. Don't fret if you have a second mortgage or a third mortgage - a mortgage short sale can still be done. For example, in California, short sale with second mortgage is very common since most residents of California have second and third mortgages. With the California housing market appreciating so much over the past few years, many homeowners are finding themselves upside down on mortgage. Will the Lender Really Accept the Short Sale and Let My Debt Go? With a successful short sale, yes. What will happen is that the mortgage company will accept the lower price from the real estate investor and consider the entire mortgage balance settled. However, the homeowner needs to watch out for the cases where the bank will let the real estate investor buy the home for a lower value and then come after the homeowner for the balance of the mortgage. Most real estate investors with etiquette will try every way to have the bank wipe off all the debt and not come after the homeowner. However, there are some banks that won't settle the debt with the real estate investor and will insist on coming after the homeowner. There are also some real estate investors who don't tell the homeowner that they are not off scott free. So, it is up to the homeowner to ensure that before they close on the deal, they have it in writing that the bank will not come after them for the remaining of the loan. What is a Second Mortgage Short Sale? A second mortgage short sale is usually even easier to do than a first mortgage short sale. The process of a second mortgage short sale is similar to the first mortgage short sale but simpler. With a good short sale case, the second mortgage short sale is almost always a success. Common Misconception That Only a First Mortgage Short Sale Can Be Done? Many people are confused and think that the second mortgage short sale cannot be done. The common misconception that a short sale is only for the first mortgage is a serious one. In order to understand why it is so easy to short sale second mortgage, third mortgage, or even fourth mortgage, you should understand the foreclosure process. Can the Short Sale of Second Mortgage Be Done? Absolutely, the short sale of second mortgage is simpler than the short sale of the first mortgage. In some states, second mortgage short sales are more common than others. In California, for example, a California short sale with second mortgage is very common. Sometimes, you will find the third mortgage and even fourth mortgage. How to Short Sale Second Mortgage? Once you learn how to short sale the 1st mortgage, the process for second mortgage short sale is similar to the first mortgage short sale. Once you have prepared a mortgage short sale for the first mortgage, you can send the same real estate short sale package to the second mortgage company to short sale the second mortgage. Similarly, you will send the same package to the other mortgage companies to short sale other mortgages. The only differences between the process of first mortgage short sale and the second mortgage short sale are specific letter to the mortgage companies and the amount of mortgage debt settlement offered. Why would a Second Mortgage Company Allow a Short Sale? Most second mortgage companies will allow a short sale because if the first mortgage company forecloses on the homeowner, the second mortgage will be wiped out. That means if the home goes to foreclosure, the second mortgage company will have nothing on the homeowner anymore. So, most second mortgage companies would rather take something now than nothing at the end. What is Required for a Real Estate Short Sale? Although all lenders have varying requirements and may demand that a borrower submit a wide array of documentation, the following steps give you a pretty good idea of what to expect. Call the Lender You may need to make half a dozen phone calls before you find the person responsible for handling short sales. You do not want to talk to the "real estate short sale" or "work out" department, you want the supervisor's name; the name of the individual capable of making a decision. Submit Letter of Authorization Lenders typically do not want to disclose any of your personal information without written authorization to do so. If you are working with a real estate agent, closing agent, title company or lawyer, you will receive better cooperation if you write a letter to the lender giving the lender permission to talk with those specific interested parties about your loan. The letter should include the following: Hardship Letter The sadder, the better. This statement of facts describes how you got into this financial bind and makes a plea to the lender to accept less than full payment. Lenders are not inhumane and can understand if you lost your job, were hospitalized or a truck ran over your entire family, but lenders are not particularly empathetic to situations involving dishonesty or criminal behavior. Proof of Income and Assets It is best to be truthful and honest about your financial situation and disclose assets. Lenders will want to know if you have savings accounts, money market accounts, stocks or bonds, negotiable instruments, cash or other real estate or anything of tangible value. Lenders are not in the charity business and often require assurance that the debtor cannot pay back any of the debt that it is forgiving. Copies of Bank Statements If your bank statements reflect unaccountable deposits, large cash withdrawals or an unusual number of checks, it's probably a good idea to explain each of those lien items to the lender. In addition, the lender might want you to account for each and every deposit so it can determine whether deposits will continue. Comparative Market Analysis Sometimes markets decline and property values fall. If this is part of the reason that you cannot sell your home for enough to pay off the lender, this fact should be substantiated for the lender through a comparative market analysis (CMA). Your real estate agent can prepare a CMA for you, which will show prices of similar homes: active on the market, pending sales and solds from the past six months. HUD-1 Settlement Statement A lender will generally require a written contract between you and the homeowner. A preliminary HUD-1 settlement statement will reassure the lender that the homeowner isn't receiving any cash from the deal. The HUD-1 form requires you itemize all charges imposed upon you and the homeowner for the real estate transaction. Essentially, it is a complete list of the incoming and outgoing funds. The contract should be written so that you pay all costs associated with the deal. And, that the "net cash" to the homeowner is the precise amount of the short pay to the lender. Purchase Agreement and Listing Agreement When you reach an agreement to sell with a prospective purchaser, the lender will want a copy of the offer along with a copy of your listing agreement. Be prepared for the lender to renegotiate commissions and to refuse to allow payment of certain items such as home protection plans or termite inspections. Who Can Qualify for a Real Estate Short Sale? Typically the lenders will only accept a real estate short sale if you are at least one month behind on your mortgage payments, have a ready and willing buyer and you are unable to debt service all of your existing liabilities. Also, if your financial situation has changed and you are currently making less money than before and you have no more savings, you most likely qualify for a short sale. This is the reason why we need the above documents to paint a clear financial picture of your current situation. The Impact of Short Sales/Foreclosures on Credit Reports Sellers may wonder whether letting a property go into foreclosure would be easier and smarter than going through a short sale. With a foreclosure, and depending on state laws regarding foreclosure, a seller could stay in the property, essentially rent free, for four months before being forced to evacuate. But that fact alone does not mean a foreclosure is better. Whereas a short sale involves offering the home for sale, generally listed through MLS. Potential home buyers will make appointments. Potential home buyers will make appointments to view homes, some will make lowball offers, and agents might hold open houses. How is the Seller's Credit Affected? Sellers will take a bigger hit on their credit report by going through foreclosure or giving the lender a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The points lost on a FICO score are as follows: Foreclosure or Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure Both of these solutions affect credit the same. Sellers will take a hit of 250 to 280 points. This means if a seller's FICO score before foreclosure was 680, it could dip as low as 400. Short Sale The affect of a short sale on a seller's credit report is much less damaging. The ding on credit will show up as a pre-foreclosure in redemption status, which will result in a loss of 80 to 100 points. This means a short sale with a previous FICO of 680 will see it fall to 580 to 600. Waiting Period Before Buying Another Home Foreclosure or Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure A seller who wants to buy another home after foreclosure will end up waiting about 36 months before a lender will offer any kind of interest rate that makes sense. Short Sale The good news for short sale sellers is the wait is much shorter before buying another home. They can buy again in about 18 months at a good interest rate. Short Sale/Foreclosure Deficiency Judgments The bad news is a seller could be subject to a deficiency judgment for the difference between the loan amount and the amount paid. In California, purchase money loans are not subject to deficiency judgments; however, hard money loans, equity loans and refinances are. Other states have laws regarding personal guarantees, which could also result in a deficiency judgment if the home owner is personally liable for loan repayment. The lender has sole discretion whether to pursue a deficiency judgment in those instances when the judgment is permitted. To determine whether a pending foreclosure or short sale is subject to a deficiency judgment, talk to a real estate lawyer. If you're a seller trying to decide whether to let a home go through foreclosure versus attempting a short sale, salvaging your credit is the main advantage to doing a short sale. But seek legal and tax advice before making that decision. Which is more profitable: Foreclosures, Short Sales or REOs? Foreclosures, short sales and REOs remind me of, "Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!" The latter are dangerous animals but different from each other, just as foreclosures and short sales and real-estate-owned (REOs) are distressed sales but different from each other. However, they are also similar because without knowledge about handling foreclosures, short sales and REOs, you could find yourself in dangerous territory. For example, while all short sales are foreclosures, not all foreclosures are short sales. To further complicate matters, REOs are not short sales either, but some intended short sales can end up as an REO. What is a Foreclosure Property? A foreclosure property is a home in foreclosure when a notice of default has been filed in the public records. It means the owner has stopped making mortgage payments and the lender has given notice that unless the payments are brought up to date, it will sell the property to the highest bidder. Lenders can foreclose for other reasons, but the most common reason lenders file a notice of default is when a borrower is at least two payments in arrears. If the homeowner does not bring the loan current, the lender will take the property away from the owner. The final step the lender takes after a certain period has passed is to try to auction the property at a public sale. Not all homes that fall into foreclosure go to public sale because owners have the right to make up back payments to a point; the time varies from state to state. Real estate investors and home buyers see profit in buying foreclosures because they can often buy the property for the amount owed, picking up the home owner's equity for free. How California Law Affects Foreclosure/Short Sale States have varying laws governing foreclosures and some follow California law. To completely understand your rights as a foreclosure buyer, contact a local real estate lawyer. However, realize that in California, a real estate agent cannot represent a buyer who is an investor to purchase a foreclosure property if all of the following four statements are true. Moreover, as an investor, you are required to comply with the Home Equity Sales Act. Among other requirements, sellers who are in foreclosure have the right to rescind a transaction within five days. Investors must give the sellers notice of that right, including a copy of the form that will let sellers cancel. Failure to comply with the Home Equity Sales Act carries severe penalties, including a provision that gives the seller the right to cancel the sale up to two years after the sale to the investor has closed and get the property back. As an investor, before you decide to buy a home in foreclosure by making up the back payments to the lender, giving the seller a few dollars and recording a deed, call a real estate lawyer. What are REOs - Real Estate Owned? Buying an REO is similar to buying a short sale except the property is already owned by the lender. The property was acquired by the lender through a foreclosure action. Often lenders will sell repossessed homes for less than the past loan balance. Bank-owned properties are called REOs, meaning real estate owned by the lender. Banks end up owning the property when nobody at the public auction bid enough to cover the amount owed against the property. Before You Buy a Short Sale Do your research before making an offer to purchase. Your agent can find out who is on title, whether a foreclosure notice has been filed and how much is owed to the lender(s). This is important because it will help you determine how much to offer.
If there are two loans, you will probably deal with the second mortgage lender. The first mortgage lenders position is protected by the second lender unless the second lender does not want to foreclose. For example, if a seller owes $160,000 to the first lender and $40,000 to the second lender, you cannot offer $160,000 because it will wipe out the second lender.
Prepare for Lender Demands
Getting a lender to approve a short sale is primarily a question of economics. You have to provide hard numbers to show that the amount of money a bank will realize on the short sale is better than the amount it may recoup from foreclosing on the property and selling the property as an REO.
A 2002 study by Craig Focardi of the Tower Group estimated that the entire cost of a foreclosure was $58,759 and took 18 months. Other factors that can influence a bank's decision include the liability risk it assumes by owning the property after foreclosures, the money tied up during the holding period for a foreclosure and REO resale, additional costs associated with an REO such as attorney fees, and the additional reserves it will need if REOs rise in the bank's portfolio.
Submit Documentation & Purchase Offer to Lender
In addition, the lender will want to see that you have your own loan available and you are pre-approved. Send a pre-approval letter to the lender. It will help if your agent sends a list of comparable sales that support the price you are offering to pay for the home.
Give the Lender a Deadline
Make your offer contingent upon the lender's acceptance. Give the lender a time frame in which to respond after which, you will be free to cancel. If the lender is under no pressure to make a decision, the paperwork will sit on an underling's desk.
Some lenders submit short sales to a committee, but most can make a decision within two to three weeks, providing you have submitted the offer to the individual in decision-making capacity. Get a name and phone number for the appropriate contact at the lender. Don't send an offer blindly to the department.
Reserve the Right to Conduct Inspections
Generally, the lender will not pay for customary items that a seller would pay. These include home protection plans for the buyer, buyer credits of any kind and pest/termite inspections. A buyer will be asked to purchase the property "as is," which means no repairs.
It is extremely important that a buyer obtain a home inspection and pay for other types of inspections such as pest, roof, sewers, septic tanks, chimney or fireplace inspections. Do not waive your right to obtain these inspections and make your offer contingent on approving them. |
| Broker/Agent does not guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or obtained from Public Records or other sources. Broker/Agent advises independent verification of the accuracy of all information provided. Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. |
![]() |
|
|
Last Week in Review - Mortgage Market Update Summary
The number of housing starts in August came in better than anticipated, according to the Commerce Department. Although since June 2008, housing starts had fallen significantly, it was reported last week that they have come in the highest yet since last November. The overall report suggests that the housing market crisis may be nearing its end and the industry is closer to stabilization. We will gain more insight on the health of the housing industry when reports on Existing Home Sales and New Home Sales for August are released on Thursday and Friday respectively.
Regarding the First Time Home Buyers $8000 tax credit, Robert Gibbs, a White House spokesman, said that the program is being evaluated by the administration to see what effect it had on home sales; there has also been speculation about possible expansion of this program. Currently, in order to qualify for the credit, first time home buyers must purchase a home before December 1, 2009.
First Time Buyers at the Beach (Malibu, CA)
REO, Short Sales, Foreclosures - Yes, even the beach (more specifically, Malibu, CA) is not immune to this economic impact. If you are in a position to purchase real estate, now is the time - to act. Where do you want to live? If you have always dreamed of living by the beach, opportunity is knocking and deals are out there.
According to a news article, in Malibu, over the last 50 years, there has been a 5% increase over time. 12 of those years have averaged 20% or more. Only 8 times has there been a decrease.
You want it, we've got it - the ultimate Malibu deals - Beachfront or Canyon, Single Family Homes, Land, Condos & Leases.
Contact 4Malibu.com, Bobby Lehmkuhl, at 310.365.7696 or at Info@4Malibu.com.
ActiveRain Corp. is not responsible for the accuracy of the site's content (which is written by members of the ActiveRain Real Estate Network) and does not endorse the views of the real estate agents, mortgage brokers, and others listed here.
Powered by the ActiveRain Real Estate Network
© 2009 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved