![]() |
|
|
Glastonbury CT Realty Market Report
December 2009
Welcome to Glastonbury, Connecticut!! Having a better understanding of the current Glastonbury realty market conditions is critical in order to help you make a more informed decision when buying or selling a home in Glastonbury. To keep you up to date, I have included Glastonbury 2009's market profile and trends for your consideration.

Property Sales
December Property sales were 24, equal to 24 in December of 2008 and -46.7% lower than the 45 sales last month. December 2009 sales were at their lowest level compared to December of 2008 and 2007. December YTD sales of 428 are running 3.4% ahead of last year's year-to-date sales of 414.

Inventory & MSI
The Total Inventory of Properties available for sale as of December was 168, down -5.6% from 178 last month and down -16.0% from 200 in December of last year. December 2009 Inventory was at its lowest level compared with December of 2008 and 2007.
A comparatively lower MSI is more beneficial for sellers while a higher MSI is better for buyers. The December 2009 MSI of 7.0 months was at its lowest level compared with December of 2008 and 2007.

Market Time
The average Days On Market (DOM) shows how many days the average Property is on the market before it sells. An upward trend in DOM tends to indicate a move towards more of a Buyer's market, a downward trend a move towards more of a Seller's market. The DOM for December was 72, up 30.9% from 55 days last month and up 14.3% from 63 days in December of last year. The December 2009 DOM was at a mid level compared with December of 2008 and 2007.

Selling Price vs Original Listing Price
The Selling Price vs Original Listing Price reveals the average amount that Sellers are agreeing to come down from their original list price. The lower the ratio is below 100% the more of a Buyer's market exists, a ratio at or above 100% indicates more of a Seller's market. The December 2009 Selling Price vs Original List Price of 92.0% was down from 95.5% last month and down from 93.7% in December of last year.

Glastonbury CT Realtor Brian Burke, ABR
RANKED Top 1% Nationally
RANKED Top 10 in CLOSED SALES for 2009 (out of 2,500 agents)
International President's Circle
Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage
cell: (860) 798-3272
email: burkecthomes@gmail.com
P.S. Are you considering buying or selling a home in Glastonbury, CT? How about the Hartford County area? Selecting the most experienced agent dedicated to the Glastonbury, CT area is imperative to promoting your home correctly as a seller or bidding on a home aggressively as a buyer. Call or email me to setup a no obligation consultation, and I'll outline each of the many strategies I utilize to gain the best results for my clients.
Cell: (860) 798-3272
Email: burkecthomes@gmail.com
![]() |
|
|
Glastonbury CT Real Estate Market Report
November 2009
Welcome to Glastonbury, Connecticut!! Having a better understanding of the current Glastonbury real estate market conditions is critical in order to help you make a more informed decision when buying or selling a home in Glastonbury. To keep you up to date, I have included November 2009's market profile and trends for your consideration.

Property Sales
November Property sales were 45, up 95.7% from 23 in November of 2008 and 18.4% higher than the 38 sales last month. November 2009 sales were at their highest level compared to November of 2008 and 2007. November YTD sales of 404 are running 3.6% ahead of last year's year-to-date sales of 390.

Inventory & MSI
The Total Inventory of Properties available for sale as of November was 178, down -8.7% from 195 last month and down -23.9% from 234 in November of last year. November 2009 Inventory was at its lowest level compared with November of 2008 and 2007.
A comparatively lower MSI is more beneficial for sellers while a higher MSI is better for buyers. The November 2009 MSI of 4.0 months was at its lowest level compared with November of 2008 and 2007.

Market Time
The average Days On Market (DOM) shows how many days the average Property is on the market before it sells. An upward trend in DOM tends to indicate a move towards more of a Buyer's market, a downward trend a move towards more of a Seller's market. The DOM for November was 55, down -1.8% from 56 days last month and down -17.9% from 67 days in November of last year. The November 2009 DOM was at a mid level compared with November of 2008 and 2007.

Selling Price vs Original Listing Price
The Selling Price vs Original Listing Price reveals the average amount that Sellers are agreeing to come down from their original list price. The lower the ratio is below 100% the more of a Buyer's market exists, a ratio at or above 100% indicates more of a Seller's market. The November 2009 Selling Price vs Original List Price of 95.5% was up from 93.9% last month and up from 93.4% in November of last year.

Glastonbury CT Realtor Brian Burke, ABR
RANKED Top 1% Nationally
RANKED Top 10 in CLOSED SALES for 2009 (out of 2,500 agents)
International President's Circle
Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage
cell: (860) 798-3272
email: burkecthomes@gmail.com
P.S. Are you considering buying or selling a home in Glastonbury, CT? How about the Hartford County area? Selecting the most experienced agent dedicated to the Glastonbury, CT area is imperative to promoting your home correctly as a seller or bidding on a home aggressively as a buyer. Call or email me to setup a no obligation consultation, and I'll outline each of the many strategies I utilize to gain the best results for my clients.
Cell: (860) 798-3272
Email: burkecthomes@gmail.com
![]() |
|
|
The Glastonbury market median sales prices dropped 16% from 2008 to 2009, moving from $388,000 to $325,000. The number of houses closing was stable, from 316 sales in 2008 to 313 sales in 2009 (based on Multiple Listing Service statistics as of January 26, 2009). For the successful sales in 2009, median days-on-market was just 42---well-priced & well-marketed homes continued to sell! The median list price of sold properties decreased almost 13%, from $399,900 in 2008 to $349,000 in 2009. The range in prices buyers paid to live in Glastonbury in 2009-- $101,500 to $1,200,000 (in 2008, this range was from $150,000 to $2.1M). The recession was buffered by the first-time buyer's tax credit, making it easier to sell more modestly-priced properties! This does not mean that your property is worth 16% less than last year...
As January 2010 comes to a close, there are 111 single-family homes available to purchase (compared to 133 in January 2009). The prices range from a low of $165,000 for a 4 bedroom, 2 bath (2,773 sf) home built in 1780 at 279 Quarry Road to $6.5M for a 5 bedroom, 5.3 bath (9,844 sf) home built in 1998 at 321 Clark Hill Road. The median-priced property is at 336 Country Club Road: 3 bedrooms, 2.1 baths & 2,533 sf built in 2002 & offered at $459,000.
Currently, there are 32 houses under contract in town. The highest-priced is 96 Chatham Hill Road, with an asking price of $879,900 (5 bedrooms, 4.2 baths, 4,869 sf, built in 1999). The median is 21 Barrington Way, priced at $354,900 (4 bedrooms, 2.1 baths, 2,534 sf, built in 1989). The lowest-priced is 1899 Chalker Hill, asking $144,900 (3 bedrooms, 1 bath, 1,015 sf, built in 1932).
For more information on the value of your home in this market, contact Brent today by cell (860-614-8927) or by email (brentbell@remax.net). You can find this blog directly by visiting www.MyCTRealEstateBlog.com.
If you want the approximate value of your home, and are not ready to be contacted by an agent, visit www.MyHartfordAreaRealtor.com . Fill out as much detail as possible about your house. Brent will respond by email only (unless you request a phone call) with an estimate of your home's current value within 24 hours of your request!
![]() |
|
|
by Harlan Levy, The Journal Inquirer
Published: Wednesday, October 21, 2009
The Journal Inquirer | Harlan Levys Consumer Diary
Over the weekend my wife and her brother finally succeeded in selling their late mother's 45-year-old house in Armonk, N.Y., after months on the market starting last summer. The sale price was about $150,000 below its original list price.
What a bummer, especially since within a week of the listing a neighbor's adult children had checked the house out a few times, complained about several problems, and ended up offering $75,000 less than the list price. But my brother-in-law was fed up with their endless dithering and flatly rejected them, sure that the list price would attract a buyer. He was so adamant that my wife couldn't argue.
Wrong! No one even looked at it for weeks. Then, one couple saw it and expressed interest, only to withdraw, saying it was just too old. A few weeks ago two other couples seemed hot to trot. After a brief bidding war (actually just a skirmish) the winners, a nice couple from Queens, N.Y., with an infant, won by underbidding the other couple by $5,000 but promising to deal with whatever we left in the house - a major factor, since my wife abhorred the prospect of sifting through 40-plus years of stuff.
However, the whole ordeal could have been avoided, according to real estate agent Rob Giuffria, vice president of Prudential Premier Homes.
First offer = Best offer
"Based on statistics, the first offer that comes in on a house is your best chance of getting the highest sale price for your house," Giuffria said, "although that wouldn't be true if you had multiple offers very quickly when the house is listed at above what you think the market value is."
Too bad a negative emotional reaction to the first potential buyers dictated what happened to my mother-in-law's house.
Giuffria's credo is that the list price has no material effect on the market value of a home, and if a home is priced correctly it will sell quickly.
"Most homeowners believe they'll leave money on the table if they list their house at too low a price," Giuffria said. "The fact is the list price has no material effect on the sale price of a home."
Trend: List low, sell high
Here's another trend Giuffria has observed and taken advantage of (which we could have used): listing a sale price below market value seems to draw sale prices above the list price.
"If you believe the market value, based on Realtors' and other professionals' opinions, is $300,000, I would recommend a list price of say $289,000," Giuffria said. "What this does is that when someone looks at the house and likes the house, they know its worth more than the list price, and it makes them think about the true value of the house, and it creates a bidding war, which gives the sellers the best opportunity to get the most amount of money for their home."
Giuffria has been an agent on two recent sales using that tactic.
· 7 Lawlor Road, Tolland, a four-bedroom, 2½ bath, 3,300-square-foot Colonial built in 1993 on 4.39 acres, in the Clayton Woods neighborhood.
"We listed it at $449,000 on Sept. 25, and the buyer signed a contract for $470,000 on Oct. 6," Giuffria said. "We had three offers within the first 48 hours, and the second offer was the offer than won the house."
The market value was probably in the high $450s or low $460s, he said, "but if we had priced the house at $495,000, my opinion is that we would have eventually sold the house in the mid $450s, and it would have taken 90 days or so."
The buyer's bank supported the $470,000 price for the house, Giuffria said, so the buyer wasn't overpaying, "and we got all of this done much more quickly than if we had priced it higher."
· 41 Balsam Landing, Glastonbury: a four-bedroom, 2½-bath, 3,294-square-foot Colonial built in 2003 on 2 acres.
It was listed at $639,900 on May 2, 2008, and was sold for $651,000 on May 5. The house was finally appraised at $682,000.
"In my opinion the market value was in the $660,000 to $670,000 range," Giuffria said. "We're not sure if the agent purposely listed it too low, but I can tell you the homeowners weren't happy when they saw the final appraisal at 682, and the buyer was extremely happy with the instant equity of the difference."
Giuffria's conclusion: You have to price right and just because you list the house at a higher price than you should doesn't mean you're going to sell it at a higher price.
"About 80 percent of homeowners list their homes at prices that are above what their real estate agents recommend," Giuffria added.
As for the overall housing market in the state, Giuffria said the market under $500,000 is "steady and trending better The market between $500,000 and $800,000 is "pretty soft, and over $800,000 is abysmal."
Indeed, he said, some of the best deals are for homes over $1 million.
Here are home sale and median sale price numbers for three towns, comparing January through July 2008 to the same period in 2009:
From $200,000 to $500,000:
East Hartford: 2008: 55, $230,000. 2009: 29, median price $222,000.
Somers: 2008: 25, $308,000. 2009: 26, $335,000.
Tolland: 2008: 57, $304,000. 2009: 37, $286,000.
From $500,000 to $1 million:
East Hartford: none.
Somers: 2008: 1, $508,000. 2009: 2, $518,000.
Tolland: 2008: 2, $506,000. 2009: 1, $515,000.
$1 million and up:
None in the three towns.
East Hartford, Somers, Tolland: none.
![]() |
|
|
How to settle a collection account: Part 2 of a 3 part series
In Part one I went over validating the debt. Now what? Let's assume 45 days has passed since you certified mail your letter. You are going to find that 80% of your validation letters go unanswered. If the collector failed to respond to your validation request, you want to send them another certified mail letter stating that that have violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by not validating your debt within the required 30 day time frame and as such they may be subject to a $1,000 fine. Also send them a copy of the original letter and your documentation that it was sent certified mail to them and received.
If the collector was one of the 20% who actually respond to a validation letter, you want to examine the documentation they sent you. Did they send everything you asked for? Did they sufficiently prove their case? Almost without exception the answer here is NO.
Let's look at a three examples of poor documentation.
In my first example: I recently received a validation response where the collector forwarded copies of the original charges on a credit card. After I added up the charges they totaled almost $1100. However, their cover letter and what they reported to the credit bureaus said they were collecting for over $1300. Now I could guess that the difference was interest they were collecting but they failed to make that claim in their validation. Since they had only validated $1100 and were demanding $1300 and reporting $1300 to the credit bureaus, they were in fact in violation of FDCPA and exposed themselves to a $1,000 fine. In this example you respond to the collector pointing out their validation only validated $1100 of debt while they were asking for $1300. Be sure to point out that this is a violation of FDCPA subject to a $1,000 fine.
In my second example: I received over 100 pages from a collector validating a cell phone bill. They sent me every page of every bill. What they failed to send me was the original contract and signature showing my client was liable for the debt. Just because they have a cell phone bill doesn't mean that my client was the one who opened the account. In addition, they failed to provide their license as a collector and authorization from the original creditor (in this case T-Mobil) to collect the debt. In this case you want to respond to the creditor that they failed to validate the debt and as such demand that it be immediately removed from the credit reports.
In my last example: I often receive a response from the collection company that our client owes the debt because they said so! I use this example here because it happens so frequently (no I'm not kidding) even though it is ridiculous. Often the collection company will take a piece of their letterhead and state on it that the client owes them money for XYZ. The answer here is obvious. They have not validated that our client owes them money. I like to point out to them if a piece of company letterhead and a statement that someone owes you money was "proper validation" then I have a stack of letterhead here and I'm going to be rich! I've even gone so far as to include in my response to them a piece of my own letterhead with a statement that their company owes me $240 ($120 an hour times 2 hours) for my time in validating this account. I do this just to demonstrate my point that their letterhead and statement does not prove a debt is valid.
In that last installment of this series (come back in 2 days), I will tell you what to do after you fire off these 2nd letters by certified mail!
:)
Matt
Toll Free: 888-NCFIXER (623-4937)
Toll Free Fax: 888-FAX-4020 (329-4020)
Local: 860-282-6181
330 Roberts Street 4th Floor
East Hartford, CT 06108
ActiveRain Corp. is not responsible for the accuracy of the site's content (which is written by members of the ActiveRain Real Estate Network) and does not endorse the views of the real estate agents, mortgage brokers, and others listed here.
Powered by the ActiveRain Real Estate Network
© 2010 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved