Boca Raton Florida Homes for Sale David Serle

So many of us continue to look as Short Sales as a negative. So I have prepared a list of what and why it takes so long, and what is short about Short Sales.

First the:

Short of it

• When you call the bank to find out an update on your file you get a very SHORT answer.
• When you submit a package to the lender you will hear back SHORT-LY (10-14 business days)
• A Lender's definition of SHORT is a lot different then a client's definition of SHORT.
• For some reason we think that if we call the bank 3 and 4 times a week that the bank will SHORT-EN the process when we know that is not the case.
• There is nothing that is SHORT about a SHORT sale.
• When dealing with banks some banks are much SHORT-ER than others (Countrywide)
• Many think that banks think like most people that is logical, but there is nothing logical about a bank when dealing with a SHORT sale.

The Long of it

• Unfortunately, everything takes a LONG time when dealing with short sales
• With managing expectations buyers and sellers will wait a LONG time before answering on whether to accept the offer or not.
• The LONG frustrating process becomes manageable when you communicate with all parties.
• The biggest problem with this LONG process is that lenders continually change their processes without communicating it to the people negotiating with them.
• Communication is key to make a LONG process SHORT-ER

I believe that Short Sales listings are very important. Besides being lucrative, it fufills our original objective and that is to help people make a tough situation better. I got in the business t help people now my motto is "I got into business to help those Long Sales become Short"

Good luck to all and may everyone educate themselves before taking these short sale listings.

If looking for an agent to help you sell your Short Sale in Palm Beach County please make sure you use a Certified Distressed Property Expert.

David Serle, CDPE, EPRO

RE/MAX Services

• Everyone is talking about it.

• Everyone knows someone who has done one.

• Everyone has thought of doing one themselves

• Everyone thinks they know everything about it.

So why are Short Sales not talked about in the media? I am not sure, but recently I found an article that many in the real estate industry have been jumping up and down about. Why does a short sale take so long?

Short Sales, why Sellers are Frustrated by them

Foreclosures, Foreclosures, Foreclosures. That is what the media talks about. Why? Foreclosures are usually not great deals, and have many repairs that may be required. Foreclosures are prevalent in the Boca Raton market, but Short Sales are probably 2 to 1. Many economists and so called experts have been saying in order for the real estate market to recover we must stop the amount of Foreclosures.

The governments answer is for the banks to modify there loans so there payment is more affordable. Doesn't that just prolong the inevitable for most? Why not figure out a way to shorten the process for short sales. If we streamline the process and make it more efficient, Guess what we will have:

• stopped the amount of foreclosures.
• Put prideful homeowners in the homes that will maintain their home.
• Bring a boost to the real estate industry including more transaction sides and volume which will trickle down to everyone involved in the real estate from the painter to the general contractor.
• Increase consumer confidence and increase consumer spending. Statistics show that when homeowners feel safe and well in their home they spend more on durable goods.

Just by streamlining the process of a Short Sale we have solved most of the domestic problems. Just as there is no logic when it comes to banks there is no logic when it comes to our government. Everything becomes a filibuster. Moving towards the future we have to become more proactive rather then reactive. When you are reactive history repeats its self.

I just came across this from www.FloridaRealtors.org

I think this would be horrible. The problem with foreclosures is not that the lenders are forcing people out of their homes and into the street. The problem with foreclosures is that there are a lot of them, and they are flooding the market. They also are bringing the value of the neighborhoods way down because lenders just want them off their books.

This program still will allow the lenders to keep the homes on the market which they will, but the homeowner will get to stay until the lease is over. Interesting article.

Rent plan may keep people in homes

TAMPA, Fla. - July 22, 2009 - Losing your home to foreclosure may no longer mean you have to leave.

Congress and the Obama administration are considering a controversial plan that would allow homeowners to rent their foreclosed home for at least five years. The proposal is setting the real estate community abuzz.

"It's clear that the modification plans have not been as successful as Congress had hoped," said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economics and Policy Research. "We need something that will make more of an impact."

The program could reshape Florida's real estate market and the overall economy. Experts disagree on whether the effects would be positive or negative. One thing everyone agrees on is this: Florida doesn't need any more vacant homes.

The Sunshine State's foreclosure rate remains the third highest in the nation. During the first six months of the year, foreclosure filings jumped 50 percent from the same period last year. One in every 33 households received a default notice, auction notice or bank repossession.

Details of the rental plan are sketchy, but the idea is gaining momentum, according to U.S. Treasury Assistant Secretary Herbert Allison. He told the Senate Banking Committee last week that the proposal was being considered for homeowners whose mortgages did not qualify for modification programs to make them affordable.

Some versions of the plan involve lenders selling foreclosed homes to approved professional landlords. In other versions, the lenders would sell to private investors or keep the home and hire a management firm to handle the rental arrangement.

The rent would be determined by the market-rate rent in the area, determined by a professional appraiser.

Jack Rodriguez, president of the Greater Tampa Association of Realtors, said the plan would "tinker with the free-market enterprise."

"I know where Congress is coming from," he said. "But my gut tells me investors would shy away from this, and banks will end up stuck in the real estate market."

Baker, who first proposed the plan two years ago, said it has evolved and continues to be tweaked. Even though people who take advantage of the plan would still lose their homes, Baker said, the plan could keep that from happening to others.

"The lender would have more of an incentive to work something out through a modification because the home would be worth less," Baker said.

Under the plan, the lender still could sell the home but, Baker said, "The homeowner would come with the home."

The homeowner, turned renter, would be allowed to stay until the lease runs out, which could last as long as 10 years.

One potential problem, however, is that many homeowners who lose their properties aren't interested in staying as renters, according to William Apgar, senior mortgage advisor for the Department of Housing an Urban Development.

The program could have an unintended consequence, Rodriguez said. Lenders would feel pressure to shed properties to avoid becoming a landlord. Investors, who would have to give up some property rights, would low-ball lenders. The result could drag down housing prices even more. (The median sales price in the Tampa, St. Petersburg, Clearwater area was $141,100 in May, down 20 percent from $176,100 in May 2008, according to the Florida Association of Realtors.) Others think the plan is a win-win for everyone involved.

Don Burnham, a real estate investor in the Tampa area and co-founder of the Wealth Restoration Institute LLC, said the plan could be a hit.

Investors, he said, would want to buy the homes because they will know they have a long-term tenant and a steady revenue source. Lenders will like the plan, he said, because they'll be able to find buyers faster. Homeowners would be happy because they'll have a secure lease and not have to foot the bill to move.

Mike Larson, a real estate analyst with Weiss Research in Jupiter, said the plan is one of several the Obama administration is hoping will keep more homes from becoming vacant.

"We don't yet know fully how the plan would work," he said. "But if you have a warm body in the house who will keep it from going into disrepair and keep the lawn mowed, that will be at least somewhat helpful."

Although I did not vote for Obama, I still believed he was the better choice. He was what our country needed as many of us needed hope. However, he is really doing some things that just do not make a whole lot of sense.

I recently read about Obama's helath care reform. He wants to subsidize the plan by taxing people making over $280,000.

Lets just distribute the wealth. We can be a socialized society. How many socialized societies work? The people that make over $280,000 are those who employ many of the average workers making $30,000-$50,000. What do you think will happen to the employees of the worker making over $280,000?

The problem with Obama is that he does not seem to think of the consequences before he acts. Everything just has to get done and fast with him.

An example: He went and decided to push this Housing Recovery Act. A part of the Housing Recovery Act dealt with appraisals. Normally, a mortgage broker would just call up one of the 2 or 3 appraisers he works with and they would appraise the property.

With Obama's plan, the appraiser cannot talk to the mortgage broker. The mortgage broker does not select the appraiser. The Asset Management Company does. So the mortgage broker orders the appraisal. 3 days later the appraiser calls the listing agent and meets them at the home. Then about 7-10 days later the appraisal goes into the system, and they contact the mortgage broker and the appraisal is uploaded so the mortgage broker can access it.

On the surface this looks fine. Here are the problems.

1. In my last 3 appraisals the appraiser did not know the area. I know the appraiser is supposed to have an office within 20-30 miles. The problem with that is many have virtual offices in many locations. So you have an appraiser that mainly appraises property 50 miles away that knows nothing of the area, and the mortgage broker cannot even speak to them.
2. The intention of the appraiser not speaking to the mortgage broker is right, but the problem is that the appraiser is allowed to speak to the real estate agent which has more of a vested interest in the transaction.
3. If the appraiser did a poor job on comparables then the mortgage broker has to submit a request for review to the asset management company which in turn will contact the appraiser. This can be a lengthy process
4. The time frame is just too long. Where we were able to get appraisals back in 2-5 days they are now taking 10-14 days. That does not seem like a huge difference in time, but it is as the seller is taking this home off the market for an extra 8 or 9 days.
5. The appraisers now make less and do more work. This system has forced out many appraisal companies because they are making half as much for the appraisal and are doing twice as much work as the guidelines of the Asset Management Company is much more detailed.

In conclusion of this program:

• This system forced people to look for new jobs.
• Forced seller to keep properties off the market for a longer period of time and in many cases received less money for their home because of this.
• You have appraisers appraising property that knows nothing about the area, and you can't even make an argument with them as you have to go through the asset management company if you have a problem. Seem like bureaucracy to you?
• Appraisers can't speak to mortgage brokers, but can speak to real estate agents.

This program has unintended consequences, and this is what I am afraid of with health care reform. We need to make sure we get it right, and have listened to every argument and consequence before instituting another multi-billion dollar program.

• I blog to inspire people.
• I blog because I always have something to say.
• I blog because I have a large audience and not everyone will listen to me otherwise if I am telling a story face to face.
• I blog to give advice and help to my fellow colleagues.
• I blog to inject good in the air.
• I blog on AR because I love the people here. I feel at home with this community.
• I blog to show people that even dummies can blog.
• I blog to receive advice on particular situations.
• I blog to vent on my frustrations.
• I blog for humor. I love humor, and continue to try and make people laugh on a weekly basis.
• I blog because people who do not blog thinks it is stupid.
• I blog because google blogs.
• I blog because many people are not blogging.
• I blog because I never liked journals.
• I blog because I have a passion about real estate that I try to make come through in my writing.
• I blog because I can.
• I blog because I want to.
• I blog to show people if I can do it then all of you can.
• I blog for my agents.
• I blog to blog.

Why do you blog?