“World's Most Complete Neighborpedia”
Explore:   What's happening in your neck of the woods?

Brian Madigan LL.B.

Illegal Basement Apartments in Ontario

Illegal Basement Apartments in Ontario


By Brian Madigan LL.B.

So, you would like to have someone help you with your mortgage payments? Who wouldn't! That seems reasonable. But, be aware of the risky proposition of renting out an illegal basement apartment.

There are literally thousands of houses available in the area right now with basement apartments, so finding one should not be that difficult. Right? No, absolutely wrong! In fact, most are illegal, so your chances of finding a legal unit is just like finding the proverbial needle in a haystack.

What difference does it make? If you rent an illegal apartment to a tenant and the municipality requires you to close it down, you will have some problems. You have to terminate the tenancy. This is your fault, and you will be liable for the Tenant's moving costs, out-of-pocket expenses and the difference between what they paid to rent your unit, and what it will cost them to rent another (this time, legal) apartment. You may be charged by the municipality under the by-law and be obligated to defend yourself in Court. You will be ordered by the Court to complete the necessary repairs in order to convert the property back to a single-family dwelling.

Why does the municipality care? In an area where the municipality has expected 5,000 residents to live, there will be an infrastructure to accommodate 5,000 residents of various ages, including roads, schools, parks, and parking spaces on the street. If suddenly, that neighbourhood grows in size to 9,000 residents through a proliferation of basement apartments there will be a serious impact upon the community.

Just what is a basement apartment? The necessary features include:

1) a distinct and separate, self-contained living unit,

2) a kitchen, or a place to prepare meals,

3) a bedroom or sleeping accommodation, and

4) a bathroom.

Certainly, if it has all four features, then it is an accessory apartment. However, in many circumstances these features may be combined, and it will still be caught by the accessory apartment rules.

Why all the confusion with basement apartments and what makes them legal? In 1994, the NDP Government, then in power, passed legislation to provide that additional units (called accessory apartments) in houses were permitted as a matter of right. As a result, anyone anywhere in Ontario could create a second unit in their house. It didn't matter what the local by-laws said; this legislation prevailed. About two years later, this Act was repealed by the Conservative government.

Municipalities were again given the right to decide where these accessory apartments could be located. However, one of the most important provisions stated that all apartments that were created under the old legislation were still legal as long as they met the requirements of the Fire Code. And later, there was another change in the law to the effect that the second unit was legal only if it complied with the appropriate zoning by-law. So, the laws concerning this matter are quite complex. The application to particular circumstances is difficult, and it is almost next to impossible to determine the legal status of a second unit at the appropriate times.

Certain municipalities have introduced or plan to introduce a registration system which will record the legal status of all accessory apartments. Obviously, you should check the status if a registration system exists.

Nevertheless, you should beware of purchasing a house with an accessory apartment. Be particularly cautious when you see the words "owner does not warrant retrofit status". This probably means that it is simply illegal. If it were legal, they would say so!

Brian Madigan LL.B., Broker is an author and commentator on real estate matters, Royal LePage Innovators Realty
www.OntarioRealEstateSource.com

Title Insurance Preferred Over a Title Opinion

Title Insurance Preferred Over a Title Opinion


By Brian Madigan LL.B.

I thought that I would give you some good reasons to buy title insurance.

Until 1997, the common practice in Ontario was to secure an opinion on title from a solicitor. If something went wrong, then you simply sued the lawyer. Now, that's easier said than done!

Title insurance has now come to the rescue. Certain identified risks are covered under a policy of insurance. The coverage is much broader than the matters set out in an opinion letter from a solicitor.

Here are some of the reasons why "insurance" may be better than an "opinion":

1) it covers matters not included in a title opinion,

2) you don't have to sue your lawyer if something goes wrong,

3) it provides funds to solve the problem,

4) the insurer provides creative solutions to rectify the issues,

5) it pays your legal fees,

6) it provides compensation to you, if your problem cannot be resolved,

7) it covers the claim and legal fees if someone sues you,

8) it's inexpensive,

9) there is a one-time premium,

10) you may save on the usual disbursements in a transaction because some searches are not completed,

11) you may save the cost of a new survey in most cases,

12) it protects you against survey errors, in both old an new surveys,

13) it protects against errors in information provided by municipalities and utilities,

14) you may negotiate to obtain additional coverage for other issues including environmental hazards, native land claims and risks you have assumed by contract,

15) it protects you against executions,

16) it protects you against certain construction liens,

17) it protects you against fraud,

18) it protects you against forgery,

19) it continues to provide coverage for problems arising after the closing date,

20) it protects your mortgagee so that the deal will be closed and the mortgage funds advanced.



There are probably more reasons to consider, but if these are not enough, then you're not going to buy it anyways.

Brian Madigan LL.B., Broker is an author and commentator on real estate matters, Royal LePage Innovators Realty
905-796-8888
www.OntarioRealEstateSource.com

Lock in Your Divorce Savings Now!

Lock in Your Divorce Savings


By Brian Madigan LL.B.

There's no point waiting for tomorrow if your assets are going up and those of your spouse are going down.

Have a look at the recent article published in the Toronto Star by Katie Daubs (www.thestar.com/printarticle/728452).

Here's a quick summary:

· Growing tired of your spouse, but worried about an expensive divorce settlement? Act now, while the economy is still in the dumps


· Economists say Canada is set for growth in the coming year - so lose your soulmate before your portfolio rebounds all the way back


· asset value is determined the date your marriage breaks down, not the date your divorce is finalized


· every day your RRSPs increase is another dollar you're going to have to share, until you give notice you want out of your marriage


· the other spouse may be taking advantage of the law


· If the date of the marriage breakdown is contested (and it often is), it could mean thousands of dollars for the other party


The Ontario Court of Appeal has recently ruled judges can take dramatic changes into account when determining equalization payments, if the difference is "unconscionable."

I was quoted in the article:

If you're inspired by the settlement, take note: some people, including real estate agent and former lawyer Brian Madigan, find the whole idea a "little abhorrent."

"You mean, I have to phone my real estate agent to find if the timing is right?" the realtor said. "Like, 'Oh my god the real estate market is going to go up in the spring, and February is the end of RRSP season, I should lock in the savings?' "


Obviously, this could start a cottage industry for real estate valuations.

Brian Madigan LL.B., Broker is an author and commentator on real estate matters, Royal LePage Innovators Realty
905-796-8888
www.OntarioRealEstateSource.com

Land without Laws

Land without Laws


By Brian Madigan LL.B.

You might think that the rule of law would apply equally in Ontario. Apparently, it doesn't, according to Julian Fantino the Commissioner of the Ontario Provincial Police.

David Brown and Donna Chatwell are suing both the OPP and the Province of Ontario for failing to protect them or enforce the law against native protesters around their home in Caledonia, Ontario.

Fantino agreed in the lawsuit that :

"....Threats, kidnapping, intimidation, harassment, vandalism, mischief and theft by native protesters in Caledonia against a family whose house is almost surrounded by the contested site are not valid expressions of a land claims dispute."

Nevertheless, the OPP stood back and failed to take action. Fantino's defence was that any such steps might escalate the situation and place others in danger, including his own officers.


Previously, the OPP has been accused of failing to enforce Court Orders issued by a Judge of the Superior Court of Ontario.

This is a rather sad situation for just about everyone concerned. From a simple real estate perspective, Caledonia remains an area in Ontario where the rule of law does not prevail, and that makes it a poor investment, notwithstanding that prices are otherwise attractive.

Inaction on the part of the government is not helping anyone.

Brian Madigan LL.B., Broker is an author and commentator on real estate matters, Royal LePage Innovators Realty
905-796-8888
www.OntarioRealEstateSource.com

Should You Have Title Insurance?

Should You Have Title Insurance?


By Brian Madigan LL.B.



That's a good question. Prior to 1997, there was no commonly available title insurance in Ontario and yet it was the norm in the United States.

Solicitor's Opinion

Traditionally, purchasers sought a title opinion from a solicitor who undertook a search of the title to the property. This included checking the chain of title as well as completing searches to determine if there were any liens or whether the property complied with zoning and building by-laws. The solicitor would express an opinion as to whether the title was "good and marketable". A mortgagee in receipt of this opinion would advance the funds so that the purchase could be completed.

If problems arose in the future with the title, liens, zoning or other matters, it would be necessary for the purchasers to sue their lawyer. First of all, most people are reluctant to sue their lawyers. While they may not like other people's lawyers, they usually like their own. So, if the claim is small, they are unlikely to pursue the matter.

Let's assume that it is a large enough claim to pursue. They will need to retain another lawyer. The second lawyer (a specialist in litigation) will have to establish that the first lawyer was negligent in completing the transaction. This is much easier said than done. The first lawyer will be very reluctant to admit "negligence", after all, one's legal reputation is at stake. So, you will probably find that the matter of negligence is denied and that the claim is being vigorously defended. This time, the solicitors will be retained by the insurers for the Law Society (which provides malpractice insurance coverage). They will have a great deal of expertise in the field. So, the second lawyer will also have to retain a third lawyer as an expert witness, this time one who is a specialist in real estate. This case is not going to be simple!

You may indeed have an excellent case, but unless your case is the legal equivalent of being rear-ended in a car accident, you're fighting an uphill battle. And, you're financing all the costs in the meantime. Further, while all this litigation is going on, the title problem is still unresolved.

For example, if your house is too close to the lot line, you will still have to make application to the Committee of Adjustment for a minor variance. If your eavestrough overhangs your neighbour's property, then you will either have to remove it, or obtain an encroachment agreement from your neighbour. This may cost some money.

Ultimately, you will have to prove that your lawyer's conduct in your case, fell below the proper and acceptable level of service. What if these problems were mentioned by your lawyer, but no one thought that anything would really ever go wrong? The municipality and the neighbour just won't notice. In this case, you've probably accepted the risk. Or, perhaps the lawyer properly explained it, but failed to really talk you into solving the problem at the time. If that "explanation" was the same explanation that is customary, then you are out of luck. There is a problem, the lawyer met the appropriate standard of care, and unfortunately for you, the risk materialized.

Title Insurance

There is another entirely different approach to this same matter. It falls under the discipline of "risk management". Just buy insurance! Whatever the problem, just figure out how likely it is, and pay the appropriate premium. Insurance will take care of the rest.

The first issue is that it doesn't matter whether your lawyer was negligent or not. So, please feel free to call, and both you and your lawyer will sigh in relief when it is determined that you purchased "title insurance".

The next step is to report the claim. You can either do this directly or your lawyer will do so on your behalf. The insurer is looking to find a cost effective solution. If the setback was not sufficient, then they will retain your lawyer or another lawyer to proceed with an application for a minor variance. If it is an encroachment agreement that is required, they will negotiate with your neighbour, pay a sum necessary to secure your neighbour's consent and attend to the payment of your neighbour's legal fees. Another solution may simply be to replace the eavestrough.

You have to remember that your neighbour doesn't have to agree, and the Courts will not force him. But, the insurer will have to offer sufficient funds as an inducement to make it worth his while. Possibly, in some cases, where there is no real solution available, you will be entitled to the difference in value between your property with the problem and your property without it.

Unlike the reaction of your solicitor to an accusation of professional negligence, the title insurer really needs some claims to pay. If nothing ever went wrong, who would buy insurance? So, they really do want to establish a reasonable track record of claims payments so that everyone will say "you should always buy title insurance".

Most of the time, nothing goes wrong, but in that less than 1% when it does, you are much better off with the insurance.

What's Covered

Most title insurance policies cover:

1) title problems that could affect the marketability of the title, and
2) legal services provided by your lawyer in the transaction.

The policy is issued in the names of the purchasers and the mortgagees. They are all covered as their interests appear. The policy is issued for a one-time premium and affords protection not only to the original purchasers but also their heirs. New purchasers will have to obtain their own policy.

In addition, certain title related issues that are beyond the scope of the usual solicitor's title opinion are also included, for example fraud, forgery, survey errors and errors made by municipalities and utilities in providing information to lawyers. Further, it covers work orders, access rights and conflicting interests in property.

Another very important feature is that the policy continues in effect. It is not a one-time opinion. If something goes wrong afterwards, you are still covered. What if your neighbour erects a fence over your property line, two years after you buy the property? You don't have to look for your solicitor's opinion! Of course, there was nothing there, but, you're still covered under the title insurance policy. So, post closing events like fraud and new encroachments are covered. So too, are some construction liens. If you simply don't pay one of your contractors and the contractor registers a lien, then that will not be covered, but if you pay the general contractor and he fails to pay one of his sub-contractors, then that lien will be covered.

The specific "title issues" that are covered would include the following:

1) defects in title,
2) conflicting interests or ownership of the land,
3) mortgages or other encumbrances affecting title,
4) the un-marketability of title,
5) lack of compliance with restrictive covenants,
6) the existence of work orders,
7) major encroachments,
8) access-related problems,
9) absence of a legal right of access,
10) errors in rights of way or easements, and
11) defects due to tenancies.

There are, of course, other title related matters that are not mentioned. In all cases, you should see the particular wording in the relevant policy.

Aside from the "title issues", the matter of "legal services" is also covered. This would include errors, omissions or negligence by your lawyer in respect to the following:

1) the manner of taking title,
2) the implications of taking title in the name of a particular person,
3) financial implications of the purchase,
4) financial implications of the mortgage,
5) Land Transfer tax implications (both its application and calculation),
6) Income Tax implications,
7) advice regarding the Agreement of Purchase and Sale,
8) advice regarding chattels with liens,
9) errors and omissions in the statement of adjustments, and
10) advice with respect to risks and proposed remedies.

So, just about everything that a lawyer could do wrong is covered. In fact, if there is legal liability at law, then you are covered. You don't need to sue your own lawyer, you just present the claim to the insurer.

The insurer will, in the event of a claim:

1) pay all the costs necessary to rectify the problem,
2) compensate the purchaser by paying up to the full amount of the insurance policy, and
3) pay all of the associated legal costs of defending the matter in Court.

What Is Not Covered

It would be reasonable to assume that some things are not covered. The standard exclusions would mention environmental risks, the purchaser's right to change the use of the property, make certain renovations to the property, native land claims and the risks or problems that the purchaser agreed to assume in the agreement. These exclusions are reasonable.

In fact, for an additional premium the insurer might be persuaded to underwrite some of these additional risks. The point here, is that they will not be covered under the standard policy that it issued to everyone. That would be too expensive! So, delete those risks, and the particular purchasers who might face these specific issues will have to deal with them, either in the agreement, through a solicitor's opinion or through a rider to the title policy.

Land Titles Assurance Fund

This is a fund underwritten by the Province to guarantee the titles to certain properties registered in the Land Titles system. There is a very narrow definition of title. At this moment, most properties are still registered under the Registry system (where no insurance program is in effect), but eventually that will change.

The advantage of the title insurance policy is that it provides an immediate solution and deals with all the associated costs. If at some point in the future, you are reimbursed through the Land Titles Assurance fund, then you would have to remit these funds to your title insurer. They paid you first, and waited months perhaps years for payment.


Premium

Generally, the premiums have been relatively low for the various coverages that are provided. In truth, most of the time nothing goes wrong. Almost all conveyances go through without a problem. But, the ones that have a problem, usually have a very expensive problem.

The title insurers are professional title underwriters. They know how often things go wrong. Even if there is an identified risk, only rarely does that risk materialize. How often have you seen someone driving very carelessly, but they didn't hit anybody. This basic insurance principle allows the underwriters to ascribe a relatively low premium to the transaction. Also, the acquisition of a policy may eliminate the need to incur certain disbursements, including a new survey. These savings can easily exceed the policy premium.

Recommendation

Buy it, it's worth it! Even your lawyer will be happy. Now they know that you won't ever sue them.


Brian Madigan LL.B., Realtor is an author and commentator on real estate matters, Royal LePage Innovators Realty
905-796-8888
www.OntarioRealEstateSource.com