McLEAN, VA -- Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey (PMMS) in which the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 4.80 percent with an average 0.7 point for the week ending April 23, 2009, down from last week when it averaged 4.82 percent. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 6.03 percent.
The 15-year FRM this week averaged 4.48 percent with an average 0.7 point, unchanged from last week. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 5.62 percent. This is tied with last week for the lowest the 15-year FRM has been since Freddie Mac began tracking it in August 1991.
Five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) averaged 4.85 percent this week, with an average 06 point, down from last week when it averaged 4.88 percent. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 5.68 percent. This is the lowest the 5-year ARM has been since Freddie Mac began tracking it in January 2005.
One-year Treasury-indexed ARMs averaged 4.82 percent this week with an average 0.4 point, down from last week when it averaged 4.91 percent. At this time last year, the 1-year ARM averaged 5.29 percent.
"Although long-term mortgage rates eased slightly this week, ARM rates remain elevated relative to those fixed-rate mortgages," said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac vice president and chief economist. "For instance, interest rates for 1-year ARMs exceeded those for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages over the last two weeks; this is the first time this has happened since Freddie Mac began collecting data for ARMs in January 1984."
"The housing market is showing further signs of possible improvement. House prices rose for the second consecutive month in February, the first back-to-back increase since April 2007, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Among the nine Census divisions, six experienced positive gains in February, led by a monthly increase of 3.8 percent in the Pacific Division."
Investors looking to acquire houses through short sales just might be in for some good news.
One of the largest holders of second liens in the U.S., the Bank of America, says it's relaxing its policy on payoffs connected with short sales.
That's important because large banks have been major impediments standing in the way of thousands of short sales, demanding money for home equity lines and second mortgages that would otherwise be worthless if the short sale property went to foreclosure.
Bank of America had been among the least cooperative of all banks in agreeing to short sale payoff terms, according to industry critics.
The company's policy was blunt: Pay us 10 percent of what the homeowners owed on the equity line balance or second mortgage, or we won't sign off on the short sale, which is necessary for the deal to go through.
Now the bank has adopted what spokesman Terry Francisco told Realty Times is "a less arbitrary, more rational" policy.
"What we're saying (to short sale proposals) is -- give us an opportunity to participate and gain at least some of the savings" that will go to the first lien holder -- the primary lender on the property -- by avoiding the high expenses and losses of a foreclosure, according to Francisco.
Bank of America is now asking for five percent of the sale proceeds on the short sale, net of realty commissions, closing and other costs.
The bank believes that should open the door to more successful transactions, as well as more fruitful negotiations with buyers and sellers to avoid foreclosures.
But not all short sale market experts are convinced that's the case. Raffi Tal, CEO of Los Angeles-based I-Short Sale, Inc., one of the largest players in the field, says Bank of America's new policy "will still jeopardize" many short sales that involve its second liens.
The bank's previous 10 percent policy meant they'd demand $20,000 on a $200, 000 equity line balance, or they wouldn't bless the deal. But their new policy still means "they want $15,000 if the net proceeds are $300,000" on a short sale, Tal told Realty Times -- even though the economic value of their holding may in fact be zero.
Bottom line for investors: If there's a Bank of America second mortgage or credit line on the house you're after in a short sale, work the new numbers. At least some of the time you might be surprised that the answer from the big bank is now 'yes.'
And watch for other major banks to follow suit.
K. Harney
If hard times has you renting out that empty room for some fast cash, you could be opening the door to a lot more cost, not less.
The Insurance Information Network of California (IINC) says financially strapped homeowners renting out rooms to help pay the mortgage or other costs may be overlooking key issues that could lead to greater financial hardship.
Community, rental rules
Like opportunistic homeowners renting space to visitors in town for special events or even like charitable homeowners housing temporary disaster victims down on their luck, struggling homeowners looking for a fast buck should check for community, legal and insurance repercussions.
Renters who sublet, owners who live in communities governed by homeowners associations, zoning violators and others living under certain community rules or regulations could lose their home through either eviction or foreclosure if they violate terms of the contract, community edicts or local law.
That's also true in some single-family detached housing communities.
Homeowner's insurance, taxes
When it comes to homeowners insurance, the rental of rooms may be considered a business. However, limits could be placed on insurance coverage, including coverage for contents, personal liability, medical payments and identity fraud.
Policy add-ons or endorsements similar to those offered for home-based businesses are available to help cover a homeowner's assets in case of a landlord-tenant dispute or suit.
When part of a home becomes a business certain tax laws could be triggered. For example to help foot the bill for the "Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008" the act eliminates a capital gains exclusion for the portion of gain (during a sale) that comes while a home serves as a vacation or rental property.
"The last thing struggling homeowners need are more ways to lose money," said Candysse Miller, IINC executive director.
She says homeowners should carefully review their insurance policies with their agent or company before taking on renters. Likewise, they should know the local rules and not try to surreptitiously circumvent them.
Renting concerns
Renters should also be aware that the landlord's policy may not cover their possessions or provide liability protection in case they are sued.
On the other hand there's always the possibility of the tenant from hell will wreak havoc and then fall back on legal renters' rights law to over stay their welcome.
Instead of jumping at the prospect of a windfall, first-time landlords should spend ample time researching city and state landlord/tenant laws, tax rules and other related information.
A detailed background check on the prospective tenant can help identify any potential problems that may arise during the tenancy.
Many cities and municipalities as well as apartment and landlord associations also offer landlord/tenant services departments to help with questions and to avert disputes.
B. Perkins
Loan modification is a no-brainer for lenders. They essentially have the following choices:
All things being equal, offering a loan modification to borrowers is usually the best option for lenders, because they avoid the high cost of foreclosure (by some estimates $50,000 to $100,000 per foreclosure) and they continue to collect interest on the loan – at a lower rate of return, but still enough to earn a profit.
Unfortunately, in many cases, another factor comes into play – mortgage insurance. If a loan is FHA- or VA-secured or the owners are paying PMI (private mortgage insurance), the lender stands to lose much less from foreclosure, because the insurance will make up a portion of the difference. In other words, the lender’s motivation to work out a reasonable deal with the homeowner/borrower is undermined by mortgage insurance – often mortgage insurance that the homeowner is paying for! When foreclosure numbers spiked, so did mortgage insurance claims. This is what contributed to the need for insurance giant AIG to receive bailout money from the government. Without it they could not have paid all the claims being made and still remain in business. AIG going out of business would have jeopardized the stability of millions of loans and caused even greater market insecurity.
If you are wondering why the federal government is willing to subsidize lenders for modifying mortgages and subsidize homeowners for making their monthly mortgage payments, wonder no more. One reason the government wants to bail out homeowners is because it has to. The government stands to lose more if homeowners with government-secured mortgages default on their loans than by paying ten thousand dollars or so to subsidize mortgage modifications for at-risk loans.You can also stop wondering why mortgage lenders approved all of those risky mortgage loans in the first place. Risks to the lenders were often reduced by the fact that the loans were insured. They could afford to gamble, because someone else would be there to pick up the tab on any losses.
Having insurance when disaster strikes is usually a good thing, but in the case of the foreclosure crisis, having mortgage insurance can work against you. It’s not like homeowner’s insurance that protects your investment in the case of a natural disaster. It only protects the lender’s investment – leaving you and your family without a roof over your heads. In addition, as a recent visitor to KeepMyHouse.com pointed out, eliminating PMI for loans that require it could make house payments more affordable, put more money in people’s pockets, and help stimulate the economy.
I am not entirely against having the government secure loans or requiring homeowners to pay PMI on certain mortgage loans. Up to this point, these programs have helped more people achieve the American Dream of Homeownership. However, when these same programs are working against homeowners during an unprecedented economic crisis, I think it is time to review the real purpose of these programs. Lenders need to start relying less on mortgage insurance and more on loan modification to mitigate their losses and help more Americans keep their homes.
R. Roberts
When home builders, the most depressed segment of the real estate industry, begin expressing optimism about a modest turnaround in the marketplace, maybe it's time for even the most dour doomsayers to listen.
Last week's home builders sentiment survey released by Wells Fargo and the National Association of Home Builders produced the single biggest monthly jump since 2003.
The survey focused on builders' perceptions of traffic at sales sites and expectations of sales in the coming six months, both were up sharply from the previous month.
Builders cited low prices, low interest rates, and the $8,000 federal home purchase tax credit as key reasons for their positive outlook.
Mortgage rates continued their decline into the upper 4 percent range last week -- averaging just 4.7 percent for 30-year fixed rate loans and 4.5 percent for 15 year money.
Some large builders have been sweetening those rates even more by "buying down" interest costs for purchasers to 3 percent or less, fixed for 30 years.
Of course, big improvements in traffic and sales projections do not necessarily mean that builders - or the real estate market as a whole -- are out of the woods.
To put the builders' sentiment survey into perspective: It's still far below the point where the builders themselves rate market conditions as "good." Most builders still rate their situations as "fair" to "poor." But they do see movement toward much better conditions ahead.
In that sense, home builders may be tuned into a much larger public perception change underway about the national economy. The Gallup polling organization's latest "Consumer Mood Index" rose sharply last week, and is now higher than it was at the same time last year.
Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke expressed a similar, mildly optimistic view last week in public comments, as did President Obama.
Meanwhile, there's fresh evidence that, despite all the moaning and groaning about real estate being in the doldrums, there's a rising amount of business getting done. Wells Fargo reported a three billion dollar first quarter profit, much of it because of record results from its home mortgage operations.
Home sales in a number of hard-hit local areas continue to soar. In Orlando, Florida, for example, March sales were nearly 50 percent higher than March 2008.
And listing prices in major markets defied expectations by showing small monthly increases, according to a new report from Altos Research and Real IQ. In sixteen of the largest U.S. housing markets, according to the survey, listing prices were up by an average 1.1 percent.
Bottom line here: Think positive -- at least a little.
K. Harney
ActiveRain Corp. is not responsible for the accuracy of the site's content (which is written by members of the ActiveRain Real Estate Network) and does not endorse the views of the real estate agents, mortgage brokers, and others listed here.
Powered by the ActiveRain Real Estate Network
© 2009 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved