“World's Most Complete Neighborpedia”
Explore:   What's happening in your neck of the woods?

John Carle

Edmonton Real Estate Market Update - July 6th, 2009

07-06-09
John Carle

Below are the statistics for the Edmonton Real Estate Market for the past week. If you have any comments about the information or Edmonton real estate, I’d love to hear from you.

- John Carle, Realtor
Re/Max Real Estate Edmonton

NEW LISTINGS # of New Listings Average List Price
Single Family 42 402, 341
Condos 31 302, 083
SALES # of Sales Average Sale Price Average Days to Sell
Single Family 44 364, 350 46
Condos 27 264, 417 54

CURRENT MARKET # of Listings Average List Price Avg. Days on Market
Single Family 2177 ~452, 828*
Condos 1821 ~267, 305*

*Average list price is based on approx. 1500 listings in the Edmonton area.

To view the original blog posting, please go to John Carle's Edmonton Real Estate Blog

In What Condition Should We Leave the House?

06-12-09
John Carle

Hey John,

We’re giving up the keys on the house in a couple of days, and I want to know how clean the house needs to be. It’ll be vacuumed and wiped down. But how far do we take it?

- Do we need to steam the carpets?

- Should I be filling and painting the walls where we had pictures hanging?

- What about the marks at the top of the stairs from the baby gate?

Thanks for your input here.

- Ryan G.

Hi Ryan!

You’re a perfectionist, so the buyers will likely be happy with most anything that YOU do for them. I have no doubt that you’ll be leaving a spotless home for them.

As a general rule, leave the house in the condition that you’d want to receive it in.

Remember that this is likely their very first home, so it’s going to be an exciting experience for them. You have the opportunity here to reinforce that happiness for them, or ruin the experience completely. I’ve sold homes that were spotless on possession and homes that were disgusting on possession. Trust me when I say that the condition of the home on possession day leaves a lasting impression for years to come.

Make them happy.

- John Carle

Edmonton Alberta Real Estate Market Gets Good Reviews from CREA - July 11 2009

06-12-09
John Carle

There’s all sorts of signs that the Edmonton real estate market is recovering, and here’s one more…

This morning, during my daily personal education (reading blogs, listening to podcasts, etc.) I had the pleasure of listening to CREA (Canadian Real Estate Association) update their forecast for 2009.

What makes this significant in my mind is that they had to revise the forecast; this means we’re doing better than they expected! This really is good news for the real estate markets across Canada, and special mention is made of the Alberta and BC real estate markets.

http://www.knock-knock.ca/documents/crea-podcast-june-11-2009.m4v

(warning: this is a podcast, so it’s a seriously big file… 54MB)

Have a listen, and let me know your thoughts!

- John Carle

Real Estate Teams Defined

05-19-09
John Carle

I’ve been noticing more and more lately how Edmonton real estate agents are forming teams to “Serve you better”. But I have to ask, does it really benefit the customers? Sometimes it does. Sometimes it’s just a marketing strategy.

I’ve spent some time on this subject over the past year, as I’ve been rebuilding my own real estate business. Through this, I’ve categorized real estate teams into 3 groups:

1. More Agents, Not More Clients

This is a fairly rare model in the Edmonton real estate landscape, but one that I think should be noted all the same. I’ve only seen it successfully dome once, and that’s by a couple of guys in my own ReMax office. They go together on all of their appointments, so that the clients know both of them.

This would be a highly effective model for the client, as they get 2 agents present for all discussions. They also benefit from never being “handed off” when their agent goes on holiday; as these 2 guys never holiday together.

The weakness is in the cash-flow. You have 2 agents who have to make a living from a single set of clients. That means 2 office bills, 2 mortgages, 2 car payments, etc. But they make the same as a single agent, so there’s less margin available. That means less advertising when the market gets tight.

2. Several agents, several clients.

This real estate model is what we see most in Edmonton. It’s the flavor of the decade, as it were. Basically, a bunch of agents get together and become a team. They service their individual clients, pool their production to get more awards, and share some marketing costs to reduce expenses or increase their reach.

The advantage here is that you tend to get a professional group of agents. They usually group around a single experienced real estate agent (the rainmaker) who leads the team and gives everyone direction. Their expenses are lower than single agents, so they can do more marketing to bring in new business.

The disadvantage is that this doesn’t really ever benefit the client. Why not? Well… you only ever deal with 1 agent at a time. So 1, 2, or 10 agents doesn’t matter; only 1 of them can show you homes or negotiate your offer at a time.

I spent 7 years in this business model, and I have to admit that it is effective. The biggest advantage in my opinion was that I could take a day off, recharge my batteries, and know that my clients were being taken care of.

3. 1-2 Agents and a Group of Specialties

In Edmonton we don’t see this a lot. In fact, I can only think of 3 or 4 instances of it existing. But it is, from a customer standpoint, the most powerful and effective team possible.

Typically there’s only 1 agent on this team (sometimes 2) rather than a group of realtors. He/she can often be identified by massive production and very little free time. What makes this model so ridiculously effective is that the additional team members aren’t Realtors… they’re unlicensed support personnel, and industry professionals.

I first came across this model in Souther California. A single Relator was selling about 350 homes per year, with no “buyers agents”. Instead he had more than a dozen administrators who were incredibly effective at their own job; they were the best at what they do.

He also had industry professionals who were on his team. But they didn’t just have him as a referral source, like most inspectors/lawyers/lenders interact with most Realtors, but instead were available “as part of the team” to contribute wherever they could. So he had a lawyer on speed dial to answer litigation questions for him. He had a termite inspector to assess the situation over the phone (am I ever glad I live in Edmonton, where termites aren’t an issue!).

The effectiveness of this model is amazing to behold. With a single Realtor, there’s only 1 direction. This means the team moves forward quickly, and can adjust to changing market conditions very quickly.

Because each team member of specialized, the client gets a higher level of service from the team as a whole. Costs are reduced for the client because much of this advice and “on call” service is free; it’s just part of the package.

So why don’t we see it more often? Well, there’s 2 big reasons. First, it requires a ridiculous amount of personal time and commitment from the Realtor. Every single phone call, all the showings, every listing and seller… it’s all 1 person. Can you spell b-u-r-n-o-u-t ?? Second, building such a team is hard to do. Finding the right professionals, the right personalities, and trusting them to do their part the right way… that’s not easy to do!

So there you have it; 3 “team models” that exist in the Edmonton real estate market. Which would you want representing you?

St. Albert Real Estate Taxes Up 5.09%

05-10-09
John Carle

St. Albert has a reputation for high residential real estate taxes, something which doesn’t appear to be changing this year. St. Albert city council has approved a 5.09% tax hike. Ouch.

But it’s not likely to affect the heating real estate market.

Here’s the article on the taxes from the St. Albert Gazette website…

By Joel McKay
Staff Writer - St. Albert Gazette


Homeowners can expect an average 5.09 per cent increase on the municipal portion of their property tax bill when notices arrive in the mail in a few weeks.

The tax increase works out to an extra $118 a year for a typical $400,000 home, after council set the 2009 rate Monday. Non-residential property owners face a 5.84 per cent tax increase.

Mayor Nolan Crouse stressed the city is in good financial shape, but the tax increase was necessary because council wasn’t willing to cut programs.

“We would have to have cut services or staff,” said Crouse. “We weren’t prepared to reduce RCMP or reduce snow removal or reduce various programs.”

The final tax increase is slightly higher than the 4.55 per cent approved during the 2009 budget. Last week council approved several budget changes that added 0.54 percentage points to the municipal increase.

Although municipal property taxes are up 5.09 per cent, homeowners can expect to pay more — a 7.38 per cent average increase — when education taxes are included. The city collects the education levy on behalf of the provincial government, but has no control of the rate. This year the province approved an eight per cent increase to the education rate. St. Albert taxpayers will contribute $23.6 million to the education system, up from $21.8 million last year.

City manager Bill Holtby called the education tax increase an anomaly.
“This is the first increase that there’s been in the education component of the property tax for several years,” said Holtby.

Holtby said the silver lining is that St. Albert’s tax increases are less than other municipalities in the Capital region.

But the complicated part, said Holtby, has to do with changes in property values and how that affects a homeowner’s tax bill. Single-family homes dropped in value by an average 11 per cent compared to the previous tax year. Multi-family homes fell by 7.6 per cent.

Holtby explained the city adjusts its tax rate to compensate for fluctuations in the real estate market. The average tax increase is based on the amount of revenue needed this year to pay for programs in services, in this case $68 million.

The municipal tax increase includes the Servus Credit Union Place capital levy and operating subsidy. This year homeowners are paying $35 per $100,000 of assessment to pay down the $38 million the city borrowed to build Servus Place. The operating subsidy works out to $17.80 per $100,000 of assessment.

Residents can expect a brochure with their tax notice explaining the 2009 property tax rate.

Now that this year’s rates are set, Crouse said his next job would be to plan for the 2010 budget this fall.

“The concern going into the fall is that we are still probably the most taxed municipality in the region. We do not have enough non-residential tax revenues, so my concern is that we’ve got to continue to reinforce with the business community that isn’t in St. Albert to come to St. Albert,” he said.

Crouse said the key for next year will be to improve light industrial and commercial development to offset the tax burden on residents but, the city will also re-evaluate all of its spending.

“We are going to be taking a real tough look at what programs and services we’re providing,” he said.

Tax notices will be issued to residents on May 29, with balances due June 30.

Here’s the link to the original article on the St. Albert Gazette’s website: http://www.stalbertgazette.com/news/2009/0506/top2.htm

This article was originally posted on John Carle of ReMax Real Estate (edmonton) real estate blog at http://www.knock-knock.ca/john_real_estate_blog/