“World's Most Complete Neighborpedia”
Explore:   What's happening in your neck of the woods?

Lee Morof, Associate Broker/Attorney

Bush's Veto Threat Of Housing Bill Is Another Example Of Poor Leadership

On Thursday May 8, 2008, the United States House of Representatives passed a Housing Aid Bill that would allow struggling homeowners to refinance their subprime mortgage loans through the Federal Housing Administration and provide funding to states to buy and fix up foreclosed homes. Bush has threatened a veto claiming that the bill would penalize prudent homebuyers and reward those that "gambled" that home values would rise. As to the funding provision to the states, Bush claims that it rewards the lenders who helped cause the problem. Total projected cost of the bill is estimated to be $17.7 billion over five years.

First, let's put this is perspective. According to some accounts, we are spending around $1 billion per month in Iraq, an amount that Congress doesn't seem to have any trouble funding. So, any claim that we cannot afford the cost of the Housing Bill is just disingenuous. In addition, the bill provides that homeowners would be required to share any profits from selling or refinancing with FHA.

Second, the contention that the bill would penalize prudent homeowners is shortsighted Bushspeak. I am a RE/MAX Associate Broker/Attorney selling homes in the North Woodward Area of Oakland County in Southeast Michigan. Currently, one of every two homes sold here is bank owned foreclosed. This influx of housing inventory has caused all homes in the area to decline in value by as much as thirty to forty percent over the last few years. By reducing the number of foreclosed homes on the market, "prudent" homeowners will see their home values stabilize and, eventually, climb. To say they would be penalized is absurd.

Third, to contend that subprime borrowers "gambled" shows how disconnected this President is from reality. Subprime mortgage borrowers typically had very little choice when it came to financing available to them to buy a home. For the most part, the choice was to buy a home under those terms or not. What the subprime borrowers did not expect was that they would be laid off or outsourced during a recession that no one wants to admit has happened.

George W. Bush's approval ratings are amongst the lowest of any President in our nation's history. His, or his conrollers', veto threats of the current Housing Bills and the reasons for them, are more examples of why he is so unpopular.

Birmingham Michigan Posts Good Housing Numbers For February 2008

Birmingham Michigan posted some nice housing numbers in February 2008 according to the April Edition of Metropolitan Realtor. Total home sales were up 26.32% as compared to February 2007. The median sale price was up by 9% and the number of on market listings declined by almost 8%. While one month does not necessarily represent a trend, the fact that all of these categories posted encouraging figures, gives cause for optimism. I suspect that many buyers who have been waiting on the sidelines, have jumped at this current opportunity to live in Birmingham. Prices have dropped considerably over the last few years and interest rates have remained low as well. Hence, many are now able to live in an area that they previously thought they could not afford.

Birmingham, Michigan and Beverly Hills, Michigan Post Good Housing Numbers For January

Finally we have some good news for the North Woodward Area of Oakland County, Southeast Michigan. In January 2008, according to Metropolitan Realtor-March 2008 edition, Birmingham, Michigan saw home sales increase from January 2007 by almost 54% (fifty four percent) and listings down by almost 9% (nine percent) for the same period. In Beverly Hills, Michigan sales were up by 71% (seventy one percent) and listings were down by almost 2% (two percent). If these numbers continue, home prices should start going back up again in Birmingham and Beverly Hills. Any buyers who are considering buying in these areas may want to buy now or they might be priced out in the next few months.

Hitwise Ranks Remax.com #2 Real Estate Website

Between 1997 and 2006, the number of home purchasers that found their home on the internet jumped by 1,200 percent according to the National Association of Realtors 2006 Profile of Home Buyers & Sellers. The use of the internet to find a home is here to stay. In fact, in 2006, it was the number two source that buyers used to actually find the home that they purchased. The number one source that buyers used was a realtor. Therefore, if one is serious about selling a home in this market hire a RE/MAX Realtor and have your home marketed where the buyers are.

A Great Example Of Why A Home Seller Should Not List With The Highest Bidding Realtor

I am a RE/MAX Associate Broker/Attorney selling homes in the North Woodward Area of Oakland County in Southeast Michigan. Unfortunatley, our market has been declining over the last several years. Approximately nine months ago, I had a listing appointment with a couple in Troy, Michigan who needed to sell their home due to a relocation. I provided them with the then current comparable sales and listing data which they found disappointing as most sellers do in a declining market. I did not agree to list their home at the top of the market as they insisted and they found another realtor who did. I have kept track of the status of the home on the Multiple Listing Service and now, nine months later, it has still not sold. In fact, it is now listed at a price below that which I think I could have sold the home nine months ago. I have learned that in a declining market, what few buyers there are look at and buy homes between the bottom and middle of the market because, understandably, they want the best deal. So, when the top of the market seller decides to lower his or her price downward they find themselves CHASING the top of a declining market. Unfortunately for them, they end up losing more money in the long run. In the case of the Troy, Michigan sellers, I felt that they needed to price their home at $359.000. The high bidding realtor listed them at $375,000. In the nine months that have followed, they have adjusted the price to $364,900, $359,000 and now it is priced at $350,000. Of course, they have continued to pay for utilities, taxes, insurance and to maintain the home. By my calculations, I could have saved them about $20,000 had they listened.