Despite the 30-year fixed rate mortgage remaining unchanged at 5.34%, the seasonally adjusted mortgage purchase application index jumped 6.7% to 285.6 for the week ending July 3rd.
This is the highest the index has been since the week of April 3rd when it rose to 297.7 and the 30-year fixed was at 4.73%.
Additionally, the four-week moving average for the purchase index, a more consistent indicator, shows that the purchase index is up 1.4% despite the fact that mortgage rates have spiked this past month.
New data continues to reveal that demand for real estate has been unaffected by rising rates, much in the same way the market never actually benefited from the plunge in rates over the past couple of months.
Here is a comparison between NAR's seasonally adjusted existing home sales and Freddie Mac's 30-year fixed rate mortgage survey over the past several months, this data reveals that record low mortgage rates have had no meaningful impact on demand. You can call it the law of diminishing returns, price inelasticity, beating a dead horse, whatever, this is a concept that I have wrote about on more than one occasion.
Sep 2008: 5.10 million sales / 6.04%
Oct 2008: 4.94 million sales / 6.20%
Nov 2008: 4.54 million sales / 6.09%
Dec 2008: 4.74 million sales / 5.29%
Jan 2009: 4.49 million sales / 5.05%
Feb 2009: 4.71 million sales / 5.13%
Mar 2009: 4.55 million sales / 5.00%
Apr 2009: 4.66 million sales / 4.81%
May 2009: 4.77 million sales / 4.86%
In order to stimulate new demand for real estate so that the excess inventory can be absorbed and home values can stabilize, it is going to require fiscal policy, not the Fed's funny money monetary policy.
According to Jack Healy in an article he wrote in The New York Times, based on a survey conducted by the National Association of Counties, "76 percent of large counties said that falling property tax revenue was significantly affecting their budgets".
This doesn't surprise me at all. In fact I have written about it more than once. The housing market is intimately intertwined with local municipalities both in terms of existing property tax revenue as well as new property tax revenue which is a product of new homes being built.
Unfortunately for local municipalities, home values on average have fallen over 20% from their peak in 2006 and new home sales are down nearly 75% from their high in 2005.
It is no wonder that according to The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities that 46 out 0f 50 states are experiencing budget stress.
California certainly is one of the states making the most headlines, not surprisingly they are also one of the states with the hardest hit real estate markets in terms of home value declines. And yet despite their budget crisis they understand the positive impact that a robust housing market can have on an economy. California has taken it upon itself to have their own $10,000 home buying tax credit in addition to the $8,000 Federal one.
The first priority of this economic crisis which is devastating municipalities, banks, consumers, and the stock market, is that you need to stop home value declines by increasing demand for real estate through fiscal policy and absorb the excess supply of homes.
Let me be the first to admit that I wish every American could own a home if they chose to, homeownership is a good thing for families and communities. Pride of ownership, tax deductions, and home equity are just a couple of the major benefits of owning a home. Unfortunately, for multiple reasons, not every American is going to own a home. Maybe it is a lack of credit, or a down-payment, or they simply can't afford the expenses, whatever it is, there is usually a good reason why about 1/3 of Americans don't own a home, it is not economically viable for everybody all of the time.

And yet despite historical evidence that supports this, especially in our recent history with the sub-prime fiasco, the government continues to try to shove homeownership down our throats.
Their latest efforts includes an $8,000 first time home buyer tax credit and a reckless Fed monetary policy of plunging mortgages rates below 5%, all in the name of housing affordability and homeownership.
The results so far for Washington's most recent homeownership initiative have been disappointing at best. Despite record housing affordability and a first time home buyer tax credit, home sales remain anemic.
Washington is trying to fix the most recent sub-prime/homeownership fiasco with....more homeownership.
As the chart above illustrates, during the modern era of the secondary mortgage market with Fannie and Freddie, home ownership rates have hovered between 62-65%. As of the 1Q of 2009 the ownership rate, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, was 67.3%, well above historic norms.
Rather than incentivizing Americans to invest in real estate, absorb the excess inventory, and stop home value declines, Washington is once again trying to pursue a failed homeownership housing policy through first time buyer tax credits, low FHA down-payments, falling home values, and reckless mortgage rates.
Agree or disagree with the politics of Joe Biden, the one thing that most people, including myself, like about Biden is that he doesn't pull any punches.

And that was certainly the case when he said this week that, "We misread how bad the economy was".
Indeed, Washington has swallowed their economic compass. And it hasn't just been the Democrats. Let's not forget the "token" stimulus checks that the Bush administration mailed out in the Spring of 2008. Or the $7,500 first time home buyer tax credit/loan that was intended to stimulate the housing market out of a depression. There is a long list of failed housing and economic policies that have been rubber stamped in Washington over the past year.
The problem of course is that while admitting you made a mistake is noble and honorable, it appears as though they are not going to do anything to correct the mistake.
Whoever said, Jim Cramer, that the housing market has bottomed doesn't know anything about Option ARMs. Those loans are represented by the light yellow bars in the graph below, the ones that surge in 2010 and 2011.

Never mind that a record 12% of all mortgages are 30 days late, or that the real unemployment rate is 16.5% and that there is a relationship between job losses and foreclosures, the Option ARM loans represent the next major obstacle to a housing recovery, and the problem with them is that they are not easily diffused with a refinance. Sorry, President Obama.
By design, Option ARMs were created as an affordability product that would defer interest payments into the loan balance. The phenomenon is known as negative amortization.
In other words, most owners of these products made a monthly payment that was less than the interest-only payment. Refinancing these Option ARMs into a historically low 30-year fixed rate mortgage will actually increase the payment.
The longer the loan was held, the larger the loan balance would be. Now the problem is that the longer the property is held, the more the home value declines. Rising loan balances and falling home values don't mix well.
During a rising tide in the housing market these products were risky, during a housing depression with falling home prices, they are radioactive.
Admittedly, while the volume of Option ARMs is smaller than the sub prime tsunami that we saw in 2007 and 2008, keep in mind that we didn't have 467,000 people a month losing their job in 2007 and 2008 either.
ActiveRain Corp. is not responsible for the accuracy of the site's content (which is written by members of the ActiveRain Real Estate Network) and does not endorse the views of the real estate agents, mortgage brokers, and others listed here.
Powered by the ActiveRain Real Estate Network
© 2009 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved