“World's Most Complete Neighborpedia”
Explore:   What's happening in your neck of the woods?

Mark MacKenzie

Bank Failures Jump to 52 in 2009

According to CNNMoney.com writer Catherine Clifford, the number of failed banks in 2009 jumped to 52 as the FDIC took over seven more banks on Thursday. The total cost to the FDIC has been $12.3 billion this year. In 2008 there were a total of 25 bank failures at a cost of $17.6 billion, the article states. In other words, we are on pace to see the number of bank failures quadruple year over year.

While the escalation of bank failures in 2009 has yet to reach the blistering pace that we saw in 1989 when there were over 500 due to the savings & loan fiasco, it may be pre-mature to start patting ourselves on the back yet. With asset values plummeting and a fleet of commercial balloon loans coming due over the next couple of years, things are likely to get worse before they get better for the banking system.

The answer is to stop the decline in asset values, both residential and commercial. The solution to this crisis is coincidentally the same piece of legislation that was partly responsible for igniting the previous banking crisis, the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

FHFA Authorizes Fannie and Freddie 125% LTV Refinances

In the latest sign that Washington has been behind the curve on this housing crisis, the FHFA announced today that they are finally changing their original refinance blueprint (Home Affordable Refinance Program, HARP) and are now authorizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to include refinance LTV's of up to 125%, up from the 105% that the original plan had been based on.

This action is a result of the plan's initial failure in recognizing just how many homes are actually underwater and were unable to qualify for the 105% LTV.

According to Moody's, there is an estimated 15.4 million homes that are worth less than what is owed.

This number is only going to continue to grow as a result of the ongoing supply and demand imbalance for real estate.

It is these types of economic lapses by the Obama administration that continue to be a drag on the housing market and broader economy. Washington simply does not understand the gravity of the situation. From the banking system, to the housing market, to the economy and the "stimulus" package, the Obama administration continues to undershoot.

Case-Shiller: Home Values Down -18.1% Year Over Year

According to the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index, home values declined by -18.1% from April of 2008 to April of 2009.

While real estate bulls will tout that the rate of decline is slowing down, there are two counter arguments that need to be considered.

First, according to the NAR, home values declines are not slowing down, in fact they jumped in May. Here is what the year over year percentage change in the median home value has looked like over the past several months according to the NAR:

Jun 2008: -6.1%

Jul 2008: -7.1%

Aug 2008: -9.5%

Sep 2008: -9.0%

Oct 2008: -11.3%

Nov 2008: -13.2%

Dec 2008: -15.3%

Jan 2009: -14.8%

Feb 2009: -15.5%

Mar 2009: -12.4%

Apr 2009: -15.4%

May 2009: -16.8%

And second, it is worth noting that home values are driven by supply and demand. And while demand for real estate over the past couple of months has appeared to bottom, at least for the interim, there is every indication that the supply of real estate, specifically foreclosures, is about to surge. According to the MBA, a record 12.08% of all mortgages were 30 days late. There is compelling evidence that points to the fact that the real estate market is only in the eye of the storm.

MBA: Mortgage Purchase Applications Fall As Rates Ease

According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, the weekly mortgage purchase application index fell -4.5% to 267.7 as mortgage rates eased from 5.44% to 5.34%.

The weekly purchase application had hit a 10-week high last week when it rose to 280.3.

And while the index did slip this past week, what we continue to see is that mortgage purchase applications, much like the actual demand for real estate, has been largely unaffected by sub 5% mortgage rates.

Here is a comparison between NAR's seasonally adjusted existing home sales and Freddie Mac's 30-year fixed rate mortgage survey over the past several months, this data reveals that record low mortgage rates have had no meaningful impact on demand. You can call it the law of diminishing returns, price inelasticity, beating a dead horse, whatever, this is a concept that I have wrote about on more than one occasion.

Sep 2008: 5.10 million sales / 6.04%

Oct 2008: 4.94 million sales / 6.20%

Nov 2008: 4.54 million sales / 6.09%

Dec 2008: 4.74 million sales / 5.29%

Jan 2009: 4.49 million sales / 5.05%

Feb 2009: 4.71 million sales / 5.13%

Mar 2009: 4.55 million sales / 5.00%

Apr 2009: 4.66 million sales / 4.81%

May 2009: 4.77 million sales / 4.86%

This data illustrates that the Fed blew $1.25 trillion in an experiment that was designed to stimulate the housing market and all they have to show for it is a short lived refinance boom, it has not positively impacted demand for real estate. Unfortunately, the unintended consequences is that as result of printing this money, rates will have to move much higher and that will negatively impact the housing market in 2010 and beyond. This is yet another reason why we are only in the eye of the storm for this housing depression.

New Home Sales Stumble In May

According to the Census Bureau, new home sales disappointed expectations by declining -0.6% in May compared to April when they fell to a 342,000 seasonally adjusted annual rate.

The current rate of new home sales continues to hover around the record low pace that was set in January of 2009 at a seasonally adjusted rate of 329,000.

The pace of home sales is still down -32.8% from last year, and 2008 was a really bad year for new home sales.

New home inventory of unsold new homes also fell by -35.5% from last year to 292,000.

The end result is that the relationship between the supply and demand for new homes, the month's supply of housing, remains very close to what it was last year. Currently there is a 10.2 month supply of new homes, last year there was a 10.7 month supply, that represents a 4.7% improvement year over year. At this rate of "improvement", it will be 7-9 years until the new home market has a balanced supply (7 month supply) and demand relationship for new homes.

But before Jim Cramer gets too excited about these preposterous "green shoots", it is important to recognize that the new home market is about to be hit by yet another tsunami of foreclosures. As we have seen in the past, as more foreclosures come to the market, new home sales typically have a very challenging time competing against the banks.

But who cares about new home sales right? It's not as if municipalities benefit from new property tax revenues or that jobs are created when homes are built, right? After all, the builders are the vilians in all of this aren't they?

Not really. The supply of new homes which currently stands at 292,000, is dwarfed by the supply of existing homes of 3.798 million. The new home market only has a 7% share of overall housing inventory.

The problem with the housing market is foreclosures, there are not enough buyers for them, specifically investors. Until the excess inventory gets cleared off the books, home values will continue to deteriorate.