“World's Most Complete Neighborpedia”
Explore:   What's happening in your neck of the woods?

Mark MacKenzie

Shocking Headline: "Housing Bailout Passed In July Making Little Progress"

"Housing Bailout Passed In July Making Little Progress" This is a headline taken from CNBC.com today.

I hate to sound so cynical, but why did anybody think that this "bailout" would work.

The government proposed that lenders write off loan balances without compensation. And this concept was the foundation behind the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008?

Let's put it into perspective. You give somebody a loan for $250,000. They agree to pay you back over the next 30 years. Two years after giving them a loan that they signed for, they give you a call asking you if it would be ok if they only pay you $200,000 instead. How well is that conversation going to go over?

And the other key ingredient in this "Act", which is really what it was, an act, was the ban on down payment assistance programs for first time home buyers.

So let me understand, there are a lot of homes for sale, we need buyers to buy these homes, but let's go ahead and remove a component of these buyers anyway. How does this stabilize the housing market?

Exactly what do these components of the legislation have to do with housing and economic recovery?

My new book, "It's The Housing Market, Stupid!" which will be out in the middle of November proposes a real housing and economic stimulus plan.

For a sneak preview go to www.ItsTheHousingMarketStupid.com

Another stimulus plan?

You mean the first two stimulus plans didn't work?

Shocking.

The stimulus/rebate checks didn't save people from losing their homes?

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act isn't allowing the housing market and economy to recover?

Shocking.

The good news is that at least the word "housing" was in the 2nd piece of legislation that Congress passed, so they are catching on, a little slow, but they are getting there.

As I have said many times before, until the Government provides a real housing stimulus, they can continue to issue as many of the silly stimulus checks that they want. They are not going to help somebody that is losing their home or somebody that lost a job.

In my new book, "It's The Housing Market, Stupid!", I propose a bold plan to the fix the housing market and economy, by going straight to the source of the problem, that there is simply too many homes for sale and not enough demand for them.

In the meantime if you want a sneak preview of the book check out this site: www.HousingStimulusPlan.org

There is a great article on CNBC.com today about this new stimulus package. Here is one of my favorite quotes:

"There's a sense that if we don't do something about housing, we will end up throwing good money after bad," says Christopher Mayer, senior vice dean and professor of real estate at the Columbia Business School.

I could not have said it better myself. Do all you want to do with bailing out Wall St., it won't matter until you fix the housing market.

Flash back to Jim Cramer in August of 2007

So I am in the process of finishing up my newest book, "It's The Housing Market, Stupid!" and in one of the chapters I talk about the events of August of 2007 as well as CNBC's Jim Cramer's reaction to the crisis in the secondary mortgage market where he calls St. Louis Federal Reserve Prseident William Poole "shameful."

Cramer is not always right, but he is going to tell you what he thinks. And this unvarnished honesty can be welcome in a world of spin doctors.

It is a really funny video clip that concludes with Cramer jokingly saying, "Just go buy some Washington Mutual and take that yield."

Over a year ago Cramer saw the train coming down the tracks that we are just now seeing. Frightening how dead on he was.

Here is a link to the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWksEJQEYVU

And here come the job layoffs...

I have been talking about this for a while now, the train coming down the tracks - job losses, and how it is going to affect the housing market.

The government is still way behind the curve on this thing and they have been for over a year. Late to identify that there is a problem, slow to react to the problem, and ineffective in their response.

In a recent article on CNBC, General Motors, PepsiCo, as well as the state of Massachusetts, plan to cut more than 8,000 jobs between them.

Best Buy plans to cut more than 10,000 seasonal jobs.

A recent survey of CFOs found that 56% plan to reduce payrolls over the next year.

These job cuts are going to further exacerbate the already fragile national housing market. And this of course assumes mortgage rates don't increase.

The monetary tools that the Fed has at their disposal are not working. This is a problem that is going to require a fiscal solution.

What this comes down to is the fact that until the housing market can get some traction, and get the excess supply of homes absorbed, the economy will ultimately continue to contract. Housing is the engine of this country and right now the engine is stalled.

NAR Falls Short on 4-Point Housing Stimulus Plan

So I get an email from NAR President Richard Gaylord a couple of days ago talking about NAR's 4-point housing stimulus plan.

I like Richard, but I believe the 4-point stimulus plan comes up short. Kind of like an air ball.

He proposes four things.

1. Remove the requirement in the current law that first-time homebuyers repay the $7,500 tax credit, and expand the tax credit to apply not only to first-time buyers but also to all buyers of a primary residence.

**This whole $7,500 tax credit is a farce. Congress takes away DPA and in lieu of helping first time homeowners purchase a home, they opt to instead "reward" those who can do so without DPA. Here is something to think about, the issue is not that first time home buyers don't want to buy, its that they can't get a loan. Dangling a carrot in front of a person with no downpayment money doesn't help anybody. What NAR should have proposed is to have this $7,500 tax credit apply to investment real estate. Give an incentive to somebody that has the capital, that can qualify for a loan, but opts to sit on the sidelines. We need new demand for real estate in this market. This tax credit does not provide this much needed stimulus.

2. Revise the FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 2008 stimulus loan limit increases to make them permanent. The Economic Stabilization Act, enacted in February, made loan limit increases temporary, and subsequent legislation reduced the loan limits and made them permanent. This has broad implication for homebuyers in high cost areas.

**Ok, this is a good idea, I agree. But again, it doesn't address the fundamental concern with this real estate market and that is that we need new demand for real estate, investment demand for real estate. The new loan limits may allow people to refinance, but is it going to have people rushing out of their apartment to go buy a home for $729,000? Does it stimulate investment demand for real estate? Nothing happens until a buyer/investor enters the market at the entry level price point. Until this happens, nobody can move up in value. The first time home buyer and investor is what faciliates real estate sales at all price points. Higher loan limits are great for refinancing, but it does not address the systemic need for new demand.

3. Urge the government to use a portion of the allotted $700 billion that was provided to purchase mortgage-backed securities from banks to provide price stabilization for housing. The Treasury department should be required to use the newly enacted Troubled Assets Relief Program to push banks to:

• Extend credit down to Main Street, making credit more available to consumers and small businesses;

• Expedite the process for short sales;

• Expedite the resolution of banks' real estate owned (REOs) properties.

**This sounds great, but can you really force this type of action? Can you force a bank to hire more people to handle short sales and REO transactions? Can you mandate how many people they need to hire? This is more of a qualitative mandate, and qualitative is very difficult to manage and measure.

4. Make permanent the prohibition against banks entering real estate brokerage and management, further protecting consumers and the economy.

**NAR has been talking about this for years. I get this. But doesn't the real estate market have bigger concerns than prohibiting banks from entering real estate brokerage. We are dealing with bank failures, and THIS is a major point of NARs housing stimulus plan? How does this stimulate the actual real estate market?