This week a real estate broker came in to retain me on a complaint filed by a buyer on a flip and it is important enough to understand why the Department of Professional Regulation is going to prosecute this broker.
First I need to let you know that I am critical of non-disclosure issues regarding flips. In March I wrote about my buyer client who was the last bookend on a flip. See SHORT SALE FLIP - QUESTIONABLE METHODS. The client found me through that article, so fortunately (although belatedly) he understands his problem.
Now onto the facts.
User Buyer comes into realty office to see what properties are available. He is referred to Buyer Broker. Buyer Broker shows him some listings and one in particular for sale by another agency. The current owner is Anxious Seller. The MLS listing price has been manually changed by the Buyer Broker from $150,000 to $185,000. It is an active listing.
On Monday the Buyer Broker takes the User Buyer to the home and User Buyer agrees to make an offer of $180,000, which Buyer Broker prepares, and inserts as the Seller the words "Owner of Record". The User Buyer makes the deposit which is given to the escrow agent and is deposited on Tuesday. The offer is signed by Lady Love (not Anxious Seller) that day.
On Wednesday the Buyer Broker has an investor client whose name is Lady Love and had seen the home two weeks earlier, enter into a contract for the same unit with Anxious Seller with a contract price of $148,000.
Lady Love closes on the purchase at $148,000 and about 30 days later Lady Love closes with User Buyer on the $180,000 contract.
Buyer Broker took his commission on the first sale between Anxious Seller and Lady Love, and took no commission on the Lady Love to User Buyer transaction.
User Buyer finds out from the public records about the flipped transaction and files a complaint with the state licensing board.
Since this is a pending matter (the names and numbers have been changed for the story above) I cannot comment on what is the outcome - or what I think will be the outcome. Clearly there was not any disclosure to User Buyer that the home could have been purchased for no more than $150,000, nor was there disclosure to the Anxious Seller that there was an offer of $180,000 prior to there being the offer for $148,000.
In some areas (mostly other countries) this type of transaction is not only tolerated, it is expected. What do you think the decision of the Department of Professional Regulation may be in this case?
Copyright 2009 Richard P. Zaretsky, Esq.
Be sure to contact your own attorney for your state laws, and always consult your own attorney on any legal decision you need to make. This article is for information purposes and is not specific advice to any one reader.
Richard Zaretsky, Esq., RICHARD P. ZARETSKY P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 1655 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, SUITE 900, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401, PHONE 561 689 6660 RPZ99@Florida-Counsel.com - FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED IN REAL ESTATE LAW - We assist Brokers and Sellers with Short Sales and Modifications and Consult with Brokers and Sellers Nationwide! Shortsales@Florida-Counsel.com New Website www.Florida-Counsel.com.
See our easy to understand articles at:
TABLE OF CONTENTS - SHORT SALE AND LOAN MODIFICATION ARTICLES
Michael Lampert Esq., the tax attorney who is Of Counsel to my law office has alerted me that on October 21, 2009 the IRS issued a new form, 4506T-EZ, entitled "Short Form Request for Individual Tax Return Transcript". This new form will make it easier for homeowners trying to short sale, modify, refinance or finance their mortgages to obtain their tax return transcripts.
A transcript is a computer print out that includes most line items on the original return. Many lenders accept the transcript as a substitute for a copy of the original tax return for income and other verification purposes.
Many of you that do short sales or loan modifications are familiar with the old 4506T form usually requested by lenders as part of the request documentation. This new form is a simplified ("EZ") form of the 4506T, Request for Transcript of Tax Return. It is only for obtaining copies of 1040 series (including 1040A and 1040EZ) individual income tax returns. It can be filled out online, printed, and then submitted by fax or mail. Upon the taxpayer's request, the transcript can be sent directly to a third party, such as a lender. It is expected that a request will take 10 days to process.
As a reminder, taxpayers still should keep copies of their original return in a safe place. Copies of the actual tax return can be obtained by filing form 4506, Request for Copy of the Return, usually at a cost of $57 per return and a two month time frame.
Taxpayers also should be careful to fill out all parts of the form, including the years requested and who is to receive the information. Remember that once the IRS sends the information to a third party, such as a lender, the IRS has no control over what a third party does with the information.
Copyright 2009 Richard P. Zaretsky, Esq.
Be sure to contact your own attorney for your state laws, and always consult your own attorney on any legal decision you need to make. This article is for information purposes and is not specific advice to any one reader.
Richard Zaretsky, Esq., RICHARD P. ZARETSKY P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 1655 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, SUITE 900, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401, PHONE 561 689 6660 RPZ99@Florida-Counsel.com - FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED IN REAL ESTATE LAW - We assist Brokers and Sellers with Short Sales and Modifications and Consult with Brokers and Sellers Nationwide! Shortsales@Florida-Counsel.com New Website www.Florida-Counsel.com.
See our easy to understand articles at:
TABLE OF CONTENTS - SHORT SALE AND LOAN MODIFICATION ARTICLES
One of the great drawbacks to a broker taking on a short sale listing is the fear and often the reality that the short sale lender will demand a reduction in the broker commissions. This has created all sorts of contraptions to make the broker whole.
I have seen contracts that have inflated commissions designed to make the lender reduce it; I have seen deals to have the buyer guarantee the broker commission short fall. There are more and some not yet invented - I wrote about one 2 years ago in BUYER AGENT REMORSE - PREVENT A COMMISSION REDUCTION ATTACK!
This summer a case was decided in Iowa (and reported by the NAR) where the appellate court said the short sale lender could NOT renegotiate the commission and it is worth noting.
The case of Stewart v. All States Quality Foods decided May 29th has specific facts but I have seen this type of scenario several times and it is worth noting if you are a short sale broker.
In simplistic summary (you can read the case by the link above and it is not too complicated to understand even on a first read!), the broker brought a contract to the lender and in the contract the lender knew that the seller was to get a commission of 10%. The lender said it needed more money and made a counter offer of a specific amount. The broker got that counter offer. Then the lender said it needed to net more and the broker offered to cut its commission to help get part of the way to that number. The lender balked and denied the sale.
The broker sued on its contract for the commission based on bringing a buyer ready, willing and able who met the counteroffer price asked by the lender. The legal theory that won was interference with advangeous business releationship - the listing agreement.
The key issue here is that the lender actively participated in the transaction by making the counter offer request and it being met. Also important is the knowledge by the lender of the existing listing agreement.
In all short sales that we handle we provide a copy of the Exclusive Listing Agreement to the lender, so knowledge in our situations would be met. If the lender makes a counteroffer then the lender is bound to accept it or it has violated at least one legal theory - if you are in Iowa. However the law and doctrines cited by the Iowa appellate court are in comport with many other states caselaw, Florida included.
Be aware of the rights and obligations of the parties to a short sale - especially when the lender oversteps its position as a lender and becomes an active participant.
Copyright 2009 Richard P. Zaretsky, Esq.
Be sure to contact your own attorney for your state laws, and always consult your own attorney on any legal decision you need to make. This article is for information purposes and is not specific advice to any one reader.
Richard Zaretsky, Esq., RICHARD P. ZARETSKY P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 1655 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, SUITE 900, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401, PHONE 561 689 6660 RPZ99@Florida-Counsel.com - FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED IN REAL ESTATE LAW - We assist Brokers and Sellers with Short Sales and Modifications and Consult with Brokers and Sellers Nationwide! Shortsales@Florida-Counsel.com New Website www.Florida-Counsel.com.
See our easy to understand articles at:
TABLE OF CONTENTS - SHORT SALE AND LOAN MODIFICATION ARTICLES
Is my mortgage lender guilty of misuse of manpower?
I just received a Saturday morning telephone call from GreenPoint Mortgage wondering why my mortgage payment was late. I asked when it was due and of course was told that it is due the 1st of the month and I have a "grace period" until the 15th of the month.
I realize that if I get the money to the lender on the 1st of the month or the 15th of the month there is no difference. I get no gold star for getting it to the bank before the 15th. In fact the amount of interest I am charged is no different whether I get the money to the bank before the 1st or after the 1st of each month. It is a 15 year amortizing mortgage and in 10 years I have never been late (past the 15th).
So why is GreenPoint Mortgage having precious personnel calling me instead of using that manpower to deal with people actually late on their mortgages or needing and waiting endless months for modifications?
Grrrrr!
Copyright 2009 Richard P. Zaretsky, Esq.
Be sure to contact your own attorney for your state laws, and always consult your own attorney on any legal decision you need to make. This article is for information purposes and is not specific advice to any one reader.
Richard Zaretsky, Esq., RICHARD P. ZARETSKY P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 1655 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, SUITE 900, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401, PHONE 561 689 6660
RPZ99@Florida-Counsel.com - FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED IN REAL ESTATE LAW - We assist Brokers and Sellers with Short Sales and Modifications and Consult with Brokers and Sellers Nationwide! Shortsales@Florida-Counsel.com New Website www.Florida-Counsel.com.
See our easy to understand articles at:
TABLE OF CONTENTS - SHORT SALE AND LOAN MODIFICATION ARTICLES
Does anyone in Versailles have any decency? Two years ago a potential client working as a mailroom clerk for 35 years - came into my office regarding a mortgage modification. He and his wife each made $35,000 annually and he purchased a new Versailles Wellington Florida home costing $1,400,000 for his family and in-laws to live in. He already had a home in Miami with a $170,000 mortgage that he wanted to keep. The 100% financing mortgage was a 1.4% pay-rate negative amortization and had no escrows.
Taxes alone on the house were more than either of their salaries, not to mention insurance, homeowners' association fees and maintenance costs.
His desire was to keep the home and although he was unable to pay my modest legal fee, he came to me 3 times - each time I told him he had been swindled. On top of that, we was about to have mandatory retirement from his long time job.
It seems that this community - the swankiest looking over the top community in the Wellington community in Palm Beach County - is not littered, but now choked with foreclosures with buyers with similar stories. Over 15% of homes in this relatively small community of under 450 homes built beginning in 2005 are in foreclosure. Many of these foreclosure homes never saw a single payment of the mortgage - yet it took lenders 9 to 33 months to file a foreclosure action. Many of these foreclosed homes have never been lived in (buyers take note!).
Now it comes out that most of these buyers all came from areas in the Miami area and many purchased not one, but more than one home - each time qualifying for a mortgage financing while keeping their already mortgaged modest home in the Miami area.
Who benefited? The builder sold the homes at double today's prices as if they each had $10 million dollars hidden in the attic. The mortgage broker fees were significant on the loans. And the poor purchaser sitting in front of me was still dreaming that this home was going to be his retirement paradise.
The Palm Beach Post newspaper this morning has an investigative article on the development "How Foreclosures Hit Versailles" with names, mortgage amounts, addresses of the buyers' modest home and foreclosed home, and lots of pictures. This is the beginning of a valuable investigative effort by the newspaper well worth reading.
The frightening issue is not just that this potential client - and all the others - "qualified" for these mortgages. I could understand if these were "flips that flopped" - but this buyer at least expected that he could afford to keep the house!!! This expectation was not from an insane person, but he had been convinced by an apparently slick sales person that he could achieve an impossible dream and ensconce his family for their retirement in a palace - all on $70,000 a year. I would bet that a good percentage of his co-foreclosed neighbors (that never even moved into their new home - probably because they could not afford the move) had that same dream.
Who pushed these buyers to purchase homes that they absolutely could not keep? What were these buyers thinking? What was the seller thinking? And what was the mortgage broker thinking? Did none of these people have any decency to see what they were participating in was wrong?
Copyright 2009 Richard P. Zaretsky, Esq.
Be sure to contact your own attorney for your state laws, and always consult your own attorney on any legal decision you need to make. This article is for information purposes and is not specific advice to any one reader.
Richard Zaretsky, Esq., RICHARD P. ZARETSKY P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 1655 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, SUITE 900, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401, PHONE 561 689 6660 RPZ99@Florida-Counsel.com - FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED IN REAL ESTATE LAW - We assist Brokers and Sellers with Short Sales and Modifications and Consult with Brokers and Sellers Nationwide! Shortsales@Florida-Counsel.com New Website www.Florida-Counsel.com.
See our easy to understand articles at:
TABLE OF CONTENTS - SHORT SALE AND LOAN MODIFICATION ARTICLES
ActiveRain Corp. is not responsible for the accuracy of the site's content (which is written by members of the ActiveRain Real Estate Network) and does not endorse the views of the real estate agents, mortgage brokers, and others listed here.
Powered by the ActiveRain Real Estate Network
© 2009 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved