“World's Most Complete Neighborpedia”
Explore:   What's happening in your neck of the woods?

Shannon Koch - RE/MAX 4000 Broker Associate

Clutter Free Helps Sell Homes!

Clutter-Free helps sell homes

<!-- Post Body Copy -->
Clutter-Free Helps Sell Homes

<!-- Body -->

At the start of a new year a lot of us get motivated to give our homes a good cleaning. It’s a way to clear the physical and mental clutter and, if you’re selling your home, it’s a must-do to help attract buyers.

According to HomeGain, cleaning up and de-cluttering can gain you thousands of dollars at the time of the sale and cost you as little as a few hundred dollars, if you use experts, to get the job done. Next week, I’ll explore other repair areas that result in the greatest return; but this week, it’s all about getting organized to increase the chances of selling your home.

I recently took on the task and unloaded about 25 trash bags worth of once-prized possessions. It’s funny how, as the years go by, time and lack of room can make you realize that those prized-possessions are just eating up space while serving little purpose. Most of us have more than we need. Having more stuff than you need in a home is not appealing to buyers. It can make them feel cramped, nervous, and overall uncomfortable in your home which may result in a lower offer.

The best approach to de-cluttering is to have an organized plan. Expert organizer Mary Pankiewicz of Clutter-Free & Organized suggests making a list of all the areas that need to be organized; otherwise you run the risk of giving up.

“What people do is they try to do too big of a project and then they get overwhelmed and then they get discouraged,” says Pankiewicz.

So, if you’re rolling up your sleeves and getting started, a good place to start de-cluttering is the hall closet. Why? Buyers are certain to open it up and check it out for space.

“The thing to remember, particularly with closets is, it doesn’t matter how big the closet is — if it looks crowded, the buyer still thinks it’s a small closet,” says Pankiewicz.

De-cluttering a home can be a huge task that can be made even more laborious if you’re not careful. “What people will want to do is haul everything out of that closet and then they don’t know what to do next because they’ve got too much stuff to deal with.”

She recommends a systematic approach to clearing clutter. Pankiewicz tells clients to first start with everything on the floor. Pull those items out and leave everything on shelves inside. Go through the items and get rid of the things that you don’t have a use for. “The golden question to ask is not ‘Will I ever use that?’ That’s what I call the keeper question because the answer to that [question] is ‘Who knows, maybe.’ So then I better keep it,” says Pankiewicz. She says the better question to ask is, “What will make me use this or what will make me need this?”

Pankiewicz says when that question is asked, often people realize that they’re never going to use the item and then are more willing to let it go.

Once you’ve found the stuff you’re ready to get rid of, what do you do with it? Many sellers attempt to store it until they can have a yard sale or they donate the items. If you donate your items, make sure you take a look at the book Money for Your Used Clothing by William R. Lewis, CPA. The book tells you what the IRS will let you take as a tax deduction in 2008 for various items.

“If it’s cluttered before the move, it’s chaos after,” says Pankiewicz. She adds, “The key mistake is people not making a decision before they pack things up.”

That can be a very costly mistake for sellers. “They put stuff in storage and they pay for it year after year and then when they finally look at it, it’s nothing they want,” says Pankiewicz.

“The sooner you get your house ready to sell, the better decisions you’ll make,” says Pankiewicz. She says if sellers wait until the last minute then they tend to hold on to things and pack them up in storage saying, “I’ll look at it later.” That’s how the clutter simply follows them from home to home.

Published: January 9, 2009

New Threats to Credit Scores

New Threats to Credit Scores

<!-- Post Body Copy -->
New threats to credit scores By Liz Pulliam Weston
Liz Pulliam Weston’s latest book, “Easy Money: How to Simplify Your Finances and Get What You Want Out of Life,” is now available. Published Dec. 29, 2008 MSN money
A revised FICO formula will kick in soon, and the balances you carry will matter more than ever. Luckily, little missteps will count less. Plus: How you can protect yourself.
A long-delayed update to the leading credit scoring formula is rolling out in 2009, offering a few advantages to consumers — and some serious new risks.
FICO 08, the latest version of the FICO scoring model, was initially supposed to be introduced in the fall but was delayed by lawsuits between its creator, Fair Isaac, and the nation’s three main credit bureaus.
Everybody’s since made up, and TransUnion will offer the new score to lenders starting in late January, with Equifax introducing it in the spring, said Craig Watts, a Fair Isaac spokesman. (Experian, the third bureau, hasn’t yet announced when it will offer the score.)
Fair Isaac says the new score will do a better job of predicting defaults than the classic FICO, which is used in more than 75% of mortgage lending decisions and by 90% of the largest U.S. lenders.
But FICO 08 is even more sensitive than the classic FICO to how much of your available credit you’re using. If your credit card issuer slashes your credit limit — which is increasingly likely these days — you could see your scores plunge, regardless of whether you carry a balance.
Another hazard: The new scoring formula responds more negatively if consumers have few open, active accounts. Because more credit card issuers are shutting down unused and unprofitable accounts, that boosts the chances of damage to your scores.
3 victories for consumers
Not all the news is bad. FICO 08 offers some definite improvements for consumers in several areas, including:
  • Collections. The new formula ignores small collection accounts in which the original debt was less than $100. This is a big victory for consumers and one I’ve advocated for years, because niggling little debts — created by unpaid library fines, forgotten parking tickets or a small medical bill that slipped through the insurance cracks — had an outsize impact on people’s scores.
  • Credit missteps. Fair Isaac says the new version is less punishing to those who have had a serious credit setback, such as a charge-off or a repossession, as long as their other active credit accounts are all in good standing.
Adding a spouse or child to your credit card as an authorized user has long been a good way to improve that person’s credit score, because your good history with the account typically could be imported to the relative’s credit file. But in 2007, credit repair companies began abusing this feature by “renting” authorized-user slots from good credit risks and selling them to strangers who wanted to boost their scores. Some of these strangers bought slots on dozens of different people’s cards, boosting their scores by tens or even hundreds of points.
Lenders pressured Fair Isaac to drop authorized-user information from its calculations. But consumer advocates protested, noting that the change could punish millions of innocent parties, including spouses whose entire credit history depended on authorized-user information. Legal experts also warned that ignoring information regarding spouses on authorized credit lines could be a violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
So now Fair Isaac says the FICO 08 formula will factor in authorized-user accounts “while materially reducing potential impacts to the score,” according to the company’s FICO 08 marketing brochure. Fair Isaac won’t disclose exactly how it does that, but speculation is that the new score will count a limited number of authorized-user accounts and ignore the rest.
Better? Worse?
Fair Isaac made another course change regarding how FICO 08 would handle “inquiries,” or applications for credit. At first, the company said applying for new credit would hurt less than in the past, since initial research seemed to show that inquiries had become less predictive of future defaults. Subsequent research, though, contradicted that finding, said Watts, the company spokesman. So you still want to be cautious and apply for credit only when necessary.
But clearly, one of the biggest hazards for consumers is the credit utilization issue. As issuers slash credit limits, the gap narrows between customers’ balances and their limits, which is generally bad for their credit scores.
How bad is tough to predict. A limit reduction on a single account won’t necessarily trash your credit, Watts said. Because FICO scores assess a lot of data, the effect of a single factor like a credit limit reduction will depend on what other data is on the credit report and how much the line is reduced.
“The person’s score could be unchanged; it could go down,” Watts said. “Or in some cases, it could go up.”
It’s fair to say, though, that big reductions in credit limits, and reductions affecting more than one account, aren’t going to be good for your scores. Credit card expert Ben Woolsey of CreditCards.com noted that issuers’ credit limit reductions so far — and the promise of more to come — are “clearly a hazard” to consumers’ scores.
Still, Fair Isaac defends the accuracy of its formulas. Watts said the company’s research has so far found the credit limit reductions have affected “a relatively small population, and those line reductions have been a relatively small amount for a sizable part of that population.”
At the same time, he said, a “notable number” of consumers have reduced their use of revolving credit such as credit cards, which is helping to minimize any impact to their FICO scores from credit limit reductions.
“Our most recent performance study,” Watts said, “indicates that the FICO score continues to appropriately rank-order consumers based on credit risk.”
Different yardsticks, same strategies
Other ways to protect your scores:
Watch those balances. The less of your credit lines that you use, the better, even if you pay your balances every month. The credit bureaus and your credit scores don’t distinguish between balances you pay off and those you carry month to month; the balance that’s reported to the bureaus is typically the one that shows on your most recent monthly statement.
If you’re in the habit of using a big portion of your credit limit — because you travel on business or are chasing credit card rewards — consider asking for a higher limit or using more than one card. Ideally, you’d use no more than 30% of your available limit at any time during the month; under 10% is even better.
If your credit card issuer slashes your credit limit, try to get the decision rescinded (read “Thaw out your frozen credit” for details). If that’s not possible, use the card less and move at least a portion of your balance to other cards or to an installment loan. For credit scoring purposes, it’s better to have small balances on a number of cards than a big balance on a single account.
Don’t close accounts. Fair Isaac has made it clear that closing accounts can never help a classic FICO score and may hurt it. With FICO 08, that’s even more true. You get more points for having open accounts in good standing; conversely, having a higher proportion of closed accounts can hurt you more.
Keep your accounts active. Issuers increasingly are shutting down unused accounts, which reduces your available credit and can hurt your scores. Even if your account isn’t closed, though, FICO 08 doesn’t like to see a bunch of unused cards — it wants to see you actively and responsibly using a variety of credit accounts.
A simple way to keep an account active is to have a monthly bill charged to it, and then arrange for an automatic monthly payment to ensure you don’t miss a due date (a single skipped payment can devastate a great credit score).
Consider an installment loan. There are two main types of credit: revolving accounts that allow you to build up and pay down balances, and installment loans that typically have fixed payments that require you to pay down your balance over time. Credit cards and lines of credit are examples of revolving accounts, while auto loans and mortgages are considered installment loans.
The FICO formula has always rewarded folks who had and successfully managed both types, which is why getting an installment loan was often recommended as a way for people with troubled credit to rehabilitate their scores. The new scoring formula is even more sensitive to the mix of credit types people have and use. In the past, people were able to get and keep very high scores using only credit cards; it’s not clear if that will still be true under FICO 08.

Senate: Tax Credit on Home Purchases?

Senate: Tax Credit on home purchases, new 30 yr fixed rate?

<!-- Post Body Copy -->

From Dave Liniger from RE/MAX international

Last night, the Lieberman/Isakson Amendment was included in the senate version of the Economic Stimulus Bill by a unanimous voice vote. This amendment would provide a Tax Credit to all home buyers at the rate of 10% of the sales price up to a limit of $15,000. The credit would be available for a one year period to all purchasers of primary residences.

Today, the senate expects to debate Amendment 353, a proposal by Senator John Ensign (R-NV) that would provide 30 year fixed financing at a rate of about 4%, for anyone purchasing a primary residence.

If these two provisions survive in the final passage of a stimulus bill they could have a tremendous impact on our industry. If they are coupled together with provisions to ease the flow of credit and reduce foreclosures, we could see an immediate and dramatic turn-around in real estate.

Grand Junction Real Estate

You can view my complete blog at www.ShannonKochHomes.com about Grand Junction Real Estate and the current Real Estate Market. I am an agent with RE/MAX 4000 in Grand Junction, Colorado. Grand Junction is located on the Western Slope and about 25 miles from the Utah border. Please give me a call if you need assistance in the Grand Junction area. I do pay a 25% referral fee to other agents. Thank you!

Grand Junction, Colorado and New York City metro had the lowest foreclosure rates in the country (3.9%)

3.3 Trillion Dollars In Property Values Lost In 2008

ChartDown_1You wonder why real estate professionals are starting to have hairlines like mine instead of the perfect head of hair on their business cards a couple of years ago, it is reports like these coming out of Zillow confirming the losses Americans have taken on their home’s value.

We are looking at approximately 3.3 trillion dollars of lost property value in the United States in 2008. That in numbers is $3,300,000,000,000 to blow your mind. Or to put it into terms we can understand:

  • It could buy over 10 million Mercedes C300 Sedans
  • It is 25 percent of the GDP of the United States in 2007
  • It is greater than the Gross Domestic Product of all but the European Union, United States, and Japan in 2007. (ref)

When a country had to absorb the loss of wealth in one sector of the economy in such a short time there is bound to be pain. Add in the stock markets meltdown and it is truly amazing that the country is as strong as it is now.

The declines mean that U.S. homeowners lost a cumulative $3.3 trillion in home values during 2008, with much of that loss coming in the fourth quarter. Homeowners lost $1.4 trillion during the fourth quarter alone; more than the $1.3 trillion lost during all of 2007. Since the housing market’s peak in 2006, $6.1 trillion in home values have been lost.

Foreclosures made up nearly one in five (19.9 percent) of all transactions in 2008. The hard-hit Central Valley in California continued to lead the nation in foreclosures, as more than half of all sales in the Madera, Merced and Stockton metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) were foreclosures. The New York City metro area and the Grand Junction, Colo., had the lowest rates of foreclosure in the country (both at 3.9 percent). via Zillow.com.