“World's Most Complete Neighborpedia”
Explore:   What's happening in your neck of the woods?

Suzi Boyle

Local Market Reports

03-13-12
Suzi Boyle
  • In the wake of the housing downturn, construction of new homes fell as builders were faced with a large oversupply issue born from the flow of foreclosed homes.
  • Sales of new homes have been sluggish in recent years and were forced to compete with existing homes which were often priced less than the cost of new construction.
  • More recently, new home sales and permits for new construction have been on the rise. The later trend likely reflects improved confidence on the part of builders that the supply of homes has fallen and that the remaining inventory does not meet the desires of potential buyers.
  • Furthermore, in this tight lending environment, builders must often pony up their own funds for construction rather than rely on loans. This dynamic makes builders particularly keen to local supply and demand dynamics at all price levels. Thus, the rise in permits in 107 of the 163 markets monitored by NAR Research is likely a reflection of improved supply and demand conditions at the most local level.

Recent Retail Sales

03-13-12
Suzi Boyle
  • The Department of Census released retail sales figures for February this morning. The headline figure rose a healthy 1.1% from January to February, mostly on stronger auto sales and the recent jump in gasoline prices. However, the core index, which excludes autos and gas, rose 0.6%, another strong figure. Furthermore, the figure for last month was revised upward with additional data from 0.4% to 0.6%.
  • Sales at furniture and home furnishings stores slipped from January to February despite signs of improved home sales, but sales at building materials dealers have expanded and sales of appliances and electronics rose by 1.4% and 1.0%, respectively. With the spring market right around the corner, home sellers are prepping their homes for the coming market, while some recent buyers are kitting out their new residences.
  • Today’s release is a good sign for housing. Consumer spending is an important driver of job creation, which has been buoyant in recent months, but must expand much further to attain a robust recovery. The sharp increase in gas prices will begin to weigh on consumers and businesses that involve trucking or driving like REALTORS®. However, the net effect is likely to be positive as stronger retain sales will help to extend the jobs recovery, which is so important to consumer confidence and home sales. Furthermore, sub-4% mortgage rates are likely to ignite consumer interest this spring.

Following Baby Boomers to Their Next Purchase

03-13-12
Suzi Boyle

Baby boomers are becoming seniors at a rate of 10,000 per day, 4million per year. By 2020, 80 million people in the U.S> will be 65 or older. Many will uproot to flee ice storms and frost heaves, move closer to kids and grandkids, or seek gated retirement communities for security and social activities. It should matter to REALTORS where boomers choose to live. Seniors commit fewer crimes and drive less, but require more medical facilities, which will increasingly affect municipal and federal spending. A study from the Joint Center for HOusing Studies at Harvard Unviersity states that the growing number of those over 65 will shift the composition of housing demand toward smaller homes, rental properties and senior housing. Already, school budgets are shrinking where age-restricted residential communities sprout. Opportunity exists for REALTORS who work with homeowners who face housing issues in the years between retirement and assisted living.

A study by the Metlife Mature market Institue on early boomers stresses that by 2020, women between the ages of 65 to 74 will head one third of households. A rising number will be responsible for grandchildredn and unable to move. According to the U.S> Census Bureau, The prercentage of people who changed residences between 2010 and 2011---11.6%--was the lowest recorded rate since 1948. There is also pent up demand of families who have doubled up in this current recession. When the economy does improve and the glut of foreclosed homes lessens, the senior niche market will be a boon to REALTORS.

Rents for the Picking

03-13-12
Suzi Boyle

While demand for European high-end property has held up in the face of economic turmoil, the lower end of the residential property market has not fared so well. But a handful of European institutional investors have spied opportunity amid the mid-market residential gloom. They are putting in place strategies to target suburban properties, far from the prime real estate of urban centers. And the U.K. rented sector is in their sights. In particular young professionals who earn too much to qualify for social housing but cannot afford to buy their own homes. The so-called "rentysomethings".

Institutional investors had been conspicuous by their absence from the U.K. housing market of late but they sat up and took notice when Akelius, one of Sweden's biggest property groups, announced plans to spend up to £1 billion in the market over the next five years.

The Swedish group's bold declaration of faith in the U.K.'s private rented sector in November 2011 coincided with its first acquisition—the £4 million purchase of a block of 16 tenanted flats in Clapham, South London. This was a modest deal for a group with 34,000 residential properties across Sweden and Germany. But Akelius has since invested in several more assets and, says its U.K. adviser CBRE, is on course to take its spending to more than £100 million by the end of the first half of 2012.

By then, too, one of the U.K.'s leading social landlords, Thames Valley Housing Association, hopes to be well advanced in its quest for £170 million of equity and debt funding for its new subsidiary, FizzyLiving. With FizzyLiving, TVHA wants to create a portfolio of more than 1,000 new-build apartments available for private rent, aimed at young professionals in London and the southeast.

TVHA has already pumped £30 million of its own equity into the venture and in February bought its first 63 flats off-plan in a development by Solum Regeneration in Epsom, Surrey. Further acquisitions from house builders are lined up and the first heavily branded "fizzy" flats will be available for rent this summer.

Fizz in a flat market: TVHA's 'FizzyLiving' plans have investor backing.

If it takes off, FizzyLiving will be the first institutionally backed foray into the private rented sector by a housing association. Like Akelius, TVHA's move has created a stir in property circles. With their contrasting financial models, Akelius and TVHA each claim to have found a winning formula for acceptable returns from suburban property with good transport links and away from the investment honey pot that is prime Central London.

Akelius' target net income yield is 4%. TVHA believes the tax efficiencies brought about by the charitable status of housing associations, which means it does not have to pay value-added tax on expenses, will cut FizzyLiving's management costs by 8% and so offer investors an internal rate of return of at least 15%.

In both cases their prospective tenants are 25 to 35-year-olds who are in jobs, earning too much to qualify for social housing but not enough to save up for a deposit and a mortgage. They claim that such people are disenfranchised and will lap up rental accommodation that is managed by an experienced landlord with a long-term outlook on its investment. TVHA nicknamed them "the rentysomethings".

Nick Jopling, executive property director of Grainger, the U.K.'s largest listed residential landlord with £2.4 billion of directly owned assets in the U.K. and Germany, believes the time is right for the U.K. sector to shake off its reliance on small, buy-to-let landlords.

He points out that less than 1% of the U.K.'s housing stock is held by institutions. In contrast, between 10% and 15% of the housing stock in other European countries is owned by institutional investors. The U.K.'s Treasury has acknowledged this disparity with proposed reforms to real estate investment trusts, which some believe will lead to the U.K.'s first residential REIT in the next year or so. In its recently published Housing Strategy, the Government also promised to examine investment in rental property as a means of easing the U.K.'s housing supply crisis.

Mr Jopling says: "The re-emergence of institutional investment in the rented sector in the U.K. is because many of the previous barriers have been overcome—political pushback, reputational concerns, benchmarking and property management capability are no longer the hurdles they once were. Many institutions are no longer asking, 'Why residential?' but instead 'How?'"

CBRE says the private rented sector has outperformed commercial property and equities with average total returns of 10.5% over the past decade. Chris Lacey, CBRE's head of residential investment and adviser to Akelius, says: "Fund managers and asset allocators are going to have far more of a responsibility to look at residential and justify why they wouldn't go into the sector."

Lessons from Berlin

Even if fund managers are persuaded by the U.K. investment case, however, sourcing assets is far easier in established rental markets such as Germany, and no less attractive. CBRE says transaction volumes across German residential property portfolios of more than 50 units increased by 44% to €6.12 billion in 2011.

Domestic investors accounted for €4.35 billion (more than 71%) of the overall investment total, followed by investors from the U.S. (5.7%), Sweden (4.2%) and Austria (3.4%). "German residential is regarded as a secure investment at a time when the European sovereign debt market is in crisis and international capital markets are volatile," says Konstantin Lüttger, CBRE Germany's head of residential investment.

Demand for housing in Berlin was particularly strong. The federal capital traded around €2.3 billion and more than 32,300 residential units last year, or 37% of the registered investment deals in Germany.

The figures show just how far the U.K. rental sector has to go. As Michael Schlatterer, CBRE's Berlin-based head of residential valuation, puts it: "Berlin is underpinning its position as the most important and most functional local transaction market for residential real estate in Europe."

<!-- article end -->

Canada Agency Says Finance Safe

03-13-12
Suzi Boyle

Canada Agency Says Finance Safe Amid Expansion: Mortgages

The Canadian housing agency’s vulnerability to mortgage defaults has soared nine-fold in 20 years, approaching levels reached by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the U.S. at the height of the housing boom. Canada Mortgage & Housing Corp. says its finances are secure unless the country plunges into deep recession for several years.

Government-owned CMHC insured C$541 billion ($546 billion) in mortgages as of Sept. 30, an amount equal to 31 percent of Canada’s annual gross domestic output, as home prices climb and construction expands. In 2006, when U.S. home prices peaked, the combined exposure of the government-backed agencies to potential defaults was slightly more than a third the size of the economy, according to Bloomberg calculations based on U.S. Federal Reserve data. Fannie and Freddie were bailed out in 2008.

“If a significant number of homeowners default, CMHC would have a lot of claims they would have to pay out,” said John Andrew, real-estate professor at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario. Homes would “sell at greatly discounted prices as supply exceeds demand,” he said, adding “the risk of this is significant.”

CMHC has enough capital to remain solvent unless Canada were to see “multi-year recessionary periods” with “persistent high unemployment going above 13 percent” and house prices falling close to 25 percent, the agency said in an e-mailed response to Bloomberg News. Canada hasn’t approached CMHC’S worst-case scenario since 1982, when unemployment peaked at 13.1 percent in December at the end of a six-quarter recession.

Not Losing Sleep

“You can’t rule out the possibility of a significant correction in Canadian real estate because there is overvalution, but I just don’t see the catalyst to cause it to happen in the near term,” said Craig Alexander, chief economist of Toronto-Dominion Bank. (TD) “I’m not losing any sleep over the taxpayer liability of CMHC insurance.”

CMHC Chief Risk Officer Pierre Serre said in a telephone interview it’s “extremely unlikely” economic conditions would push CMHC into insolvency.

Canadian home sales accelerated in February on an annual basis, regional data show, adding to evidence the country’s housing market remains buoyant amid low mortgage rates.

Canadian housing prices have increased 44 percent since 2006, while U.S. prices have fallen 32 percent. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, who has acted to try to cool the market three times since 2008, warned again this week that families should be careful about taking on debts they won’t be able to afford when interest rates rise.

Greatest Domestic Threat

The Bank of Canada, which has kept the country’s benchmark interest rate at 1 percent since September 2010, reiterated yesterday record household debts represent the greatest domestic threat to the country’s economic outlook. The central bank forecasts consumption and housing will account for more than half of the country’s 2 percent economic growth this year, after such spending helped lead the economy out of a recession in 2009 ahead of other Group of Seven nations.

CMHC’s estimate of its ability to stay solvent is based on stress tests it conducted last year using 10,000 economic scenarios. The probability of insolvency is less than 0.5 percent, the agency said. An increase in unemployment and decrease in housing prices would be the main driver of insurance claims against CMHC, followed “much further down” by an increase in interest rates, Serre said.

Chances of Correction

Another 1980s-style housing correction can’t be ruled out, said Finn Poschmann, vice president of research at the Toronto- based think-tank C.D. Howe Institute. “Everything under the sun will happen again. It always does,” Poschmann said, adding CMHC’s stress tests would be more credible if the agency provided enough data for outsiders to validate the results.

There’s a 15 percent chance housing prices will decline 10 percent or more over the next year, according to the median of a Bloomberg survey of 13 economists last month. CMHC said in a Feb. 13 report the average price of existing homes will climb 2.7 percent in 2013.

“Although there were a lot of discussions in the public domain about a house-price bubble, I must say clear evidence is lacking to support those conclusions,” said Mathieu Laberge, CMHC’s deputy chief economist, in a telephone interview.

Unlike the U.S., Canada avoided having to directly inject public money into the country’s financial institutions during the financial crisis. In September 2008, the U.S. took control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which have since received more than $180 billion in government funds. Freddie Mac said today it will ask for $146 million more in aid to cover its deficit at the end of last year.

Growing Balance Sheet

As Canada’s housing market has boomed, CMHC’s balance sheet has grown to record levels. In 1982, CMHC insured C$29.1 billion of mortgages, equal to 7.7 percent of the country’s output, less than one-quarter of today’s proportion. The agency’s total assets have increased from C$8.9 billion in 1991 to C$294 billion at the end of September.

This growth has put CMHC under greater scrutiny. In a December report, International Monetary Fund staff called on the federal government to review the agency’s governance and oversight, and assess whether the agency needs to do more to protect itself against housing market risks.

CMHC was established in 1946 to address a housing shortage at the end of the Second World War. It began insuring mortgages in 1954, the agency says, partly to encourage private lenders to play a bigger role in mortgage underwriting.

Rise in Claims

In the late 1970s, claims on CMHC insurance rose sharply following losses on programs to insure homes and rental units for low-income individuals. The rise in claims created a C$786 million actuarial deficit in the agency’s insurance fund by 1984, a hole it filled partly by borrowing from the government.

By insuring mortgages against default, CMHC says it helps lenders keep mortgage rates low. The agency also buys mortgage- backed securities from financial institutions, which it says lowers funding costs for banks and other lenders.

In Canada, federally regulated financial institutions must obtain insurance on mortgages where the downpayment is less than 20 percent of the purchase price. While CMHC insures these loans, 73 percent of its coverage is on mortgages that have loan-to-value ratios of less than 80 percent, which are often securitized by Canada’s largest banks.

The agency controls about 70 percent of Canada’s mortgage- insurance market. The rest is held by private insurers such as Genworth MI Canada Inc. (MIC) and Canada Guaranty Mortgage Insurance Co.

Canada Mortgage Bonds

Since 2001, CMHC has funded its purchases of mortgage- backed securities by issuing Canada Mortgage Bonds, which are backed by the Canadian government and share its top credit rating. CMHC issued more bonds last year than any provincial government, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The agency’s guarantees on Canada Mortgage Bonds and mortgage-backed securities have risen to C$334 billion from C$8.4 billion in 1991.

Bonds issued by Canada Housing Trust, CMHC’s financing arm, have lost 0.3 percent this year through yesterday, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch data. That compares with losses of 0.4 percent for federal government bonds, and gains of 0.9 percent for global government bonds. Housing Trust bonds made 6 percent last year, versus 9.6 percent for Canadian governments and 6.1 percent for global sovereign debt.

The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), the country’s banking regulator, doesn’t formally oversee CMHC. Still, the agency says it holds more than twice the level of capital OSFI requires private mortgage insurers to hold.

Few AAA Sovereigns

“If you look at Canada’s ability to pay relative to most of its peers in the G-7 and the rest of the world, it’s pretty darn good,” said Marc Rouleau, Montreal-based vice president of fixed income at Standard Life Investments, which manages C$31.5 billion in assets in Canada. “Canada’s one of the few remaining sovereign AAAs out there.”

CMHC points to several differences between the U.S. and Canadian home-finance systems. The “subprime” loan market didn’t take hold in Canada like it did in the U.S., the agency says, and so it isn’t exposed to such risky loans, as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government-controlled companies that buy mortgages and repackage them as bonds. Pressure to enhance short-term returns for shareholders was one of the factors that led Fannie and Freddie to buy risky mortgages, according to a panel set up by Congress to look into the causes of the crisis.

Government-Owned

While CMHC also holds mortgage-backed securities, its main business is insuring home loans against the risk of default. CMHC is fully owned by the federal government.

Amid concerns about the country’s housing market, Flaherty may be preparing to further rein in CMHC. In his budget last year, Flaherty gave himself the authority to charge CMHC to compensate for the risks posed by its insurance book.

The government may also soon need to decide whether to raise the C$600-billion limit CMHC has on the amount of mortgage insurance it is allowed to issue. The corporation said Jan. 31 it has been rationing insurance for lenders.

“We think we’re going to be able manage within the limit,” Serre said.

CMHC reports to the country’s Parliament through Human Resources Minister Diane Finley. A spokeswoman for Finley, Alyson Queen, said CMHC is operating within its insurance limits, and declined to comment on the agency’s risk management and oversight.