Tomorrow the voters in Iowa will take the first official step towards selecting the two major party candidates for President of the United States. If your only source of news is the major networks, you might be under the impression that the race for the democratic nomination only has two contestants, maybe three.
Hillary Clinton
Barrack Obama
John Edwards
I think that this is ashame! Especially when you consider that Iowa is the very first state to go to the polls in the country. How can the press be so sure that Ms. Clinton or Mr. Barrack is going to be the standard bearer for the Democratic party?
The situation is similar on the Republican side of the race except that while the press has attempted to anoint two top contenders, no two candidates have really been able to separate themselves from the pack. This leaves a couple of what the press has openly referred to as "second tier" candidates still in the hunt. As a matter of fact, one of these "second tier" candidates has been able to elevate himself to the position of "top contender", that's Mike Huckabee.
Ron Paul has captured the attention of many with his down to earth persona and his willingness to speak his mind. To me, he's the polar opposite of Ms. Clinton on the democratic side of the race who seems to have sold her soul in order to capture the nomination.
That's not to say that I couldn't support her in the general election, especially if she picks Wesley Clark to be her running mate in the event that she captures the nomination, but I do think that she was playing politics when she voted to authorize the war in Iraq and now that the winds have shifted away from that position, so has Ms. Clinton. If I was convinced that she had actually changed her thinking on the war, I wouldn't hold this against her, but I think that her current "anti-war" rhetoric is more motivated by polls than by conscious.
Electability
This is a term that I particularly resent. This early into the process, how can the press determine who is electable and who isn't? I guess if you're pragmatic and look at each of the candidates ability to raise money you might be able to make a reasonably accurate prediction on who is electable and who isn't, but isn't that the jobs of the various states holding primaries? Also, should money be the sole determinate of who is a serious candidate and who isn't?
I mean, look at Mike Gravel, the former Senator from Alaska. Tell me the truth, did you even know that he was running? Probably not. Yet, visit his website, "Mike Gravel 08" and you'll see that he has some great ideas! For one he's in favor of doing away with the IRS and going to a National Sales Tax. On his web site he goes into the nuts and bolts of how this could work and how it would benefit us as a country.
No, he's not the prettiest candidate running, but should that really matter?
How about Dennis Kucinich? Definitely not the prettiest candidate (his wife is hot though), but check out Kucinich for President his web site and you'll see that he's given a lot of thought to the issues that face us.
So, Who Would You Vote For Bob, If You Lived In Iowa?
Well, my endorsement might not be worth a hill of beans and might not be anything that any of the candidates would want, but if I lived in Iowa today, I'd have to give my vote to Barrack Obama.
After reading through each of the candidate's web sites, I think that he is (1) indeed electable and (2) the most likely to take the steps to best serve the people of the United States. His positions seem well thought out and my gut level is that he would put the good of the country ahead of the good of the big money special interests.
John Edwards was a close second, but his position on out lawing Yield Spread Premiums would have to change before I could back him. Normally, I wouldn't rule somebody out on any single issue, but Yield Spread Premiums are near and dear to my heart and by opposing them, Mr. Edwards shows that he isn't above pandering to Big Money Special interest groups, such as the banking lobby.
Hillary Clinton, as mentioned above, lost me with her vote on the Iraq War and her pandering to the insurance industry in regards to Universal Health Coverage for all Americans. While I would love to see Bill as the "First Dude" and I would support her if she were to win the Democratic Nomination, I can't support her right now when there are better choices to be had.
Also, while I didn't endorse him (because I didn't feel that he would be the most competitive against the Republican's in the general election if he were to secure the nomination. i.e I didn't think that he was the most "Electable") I really wish that the other candidates would read his position papers. If I could combine John Edwards or Barrack Obama's charisma with Gravel's positions, not only would I vote for him, I'd be in Iowa campaigning for him!
R. B. "Bob" Mitchell
ValueList Real Estate Services, Inc.
Bob Mitchell is the president of ValueList Real Estate Services, Inc., St. Louis' largest discount/full-service real estate and mortgage company. To find out more about Bob, ValueList or our flat-fee listing program please feel free to visit our web page, valuelistre.com
ActiveRain Corp. is not responsible for the accuracy of the site's content (which is written by members of the ActiveRain Real Estate Network) and does not endorse the views of the real estate agents, mortgage brokers, and others listed here.
Powered by the ActiveRain Real Estate Network
© 2009 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved