“World's Most Complete Neighborpedia”
Explore:   What's happening in your neck of the woods?

Bend, OR

FHA Numbers to Remember: Here is the White House Post on FHA Streamlined Refis

Dave Woodland - Your Bend, OR Friendly, Knowledgable Mortgage Professional: Loan Officer in Bend, OR

BELOW IS THE DATA SHEET RIGHT FROM THE WHITE HOUSE:

KEY POINT: APPLIES TO REFINANCES OF LOANS ORIGINATED BEFORE 6/1/2009.

KEY FHA NUMBERS TO REMEMBER: (assuming 96.5% loan)

Upfront MI: Was: 1.0% Will be 1.75%, but STREAMLINED ONLY 0.1% !!!
Annual MI: Was: 1.15% Will be 1.25%, but STEAMLINED ONLY 0.55% !!!

Now from the White House:

Reducing Fees for FHA Borrowers Seeking to Refinance – Saving Homeowners Hundreds of Dollars A Year

The FHA offers a streamlined refinancing program to allow borrowers with FHA-backed mortgages to refinance their loans at lower cost and with fewer burdens. This program has helped hundreds of thousands of families refinance, but lender reticence and fees have kept many families from participating. Today, the President is announcing new steps to increase the reach and effectiveness of the program, reducing the fees that participants will pay on these loans.

Cutting its Fees Substantially: The FHA currently charges an up-front mortgage insurance premium of 1% of the borrower’s loan balance and an additional 1.15% of the balance per year. FHA is reducing the up-front premium to .01% for streamlined refinancings of loans originated prior to June 1, 2009 and cutting the annual fee for these refinancings in half, to .55%. Together these reductions could save the typical FHA borrower about a thousand dollars a year.

An Estimated 2-3 Million FHA Borrowers Will Be Eligible to Benefit: We estimate that approximately 2-3 million FHA borrowers are eligible to benefit from the program with these changes. While it is always difficult to estimate participation in these programs, this will result in significant monthly savings for hundreds of thousands of families.


Reduction in Fees Could Save the Typical Borrower About a Thousand Dollars a Year – On Top of Savings from Refinancing

• Consider a typical FHA borrower with $175,000 outstanding on the

Tetherow . . . A Deam Comes True

Sandy and John Kohlmoos: Real Estate Agent in Bend, OR

Tetherow . . . A Dream Comes True

Post image for Tetherow . . . A Dream Comes True

The following is an excerpt from the Bend Bulletin; it was written by Carrie Ramoz.

Tetherow . . . A Dream Comes True

2017 seemed like the distant future to Bend’s Tim Williams and his family. When they planned out their future, it looked like 2017 was the year they could fulfill their desire of living in Tetherow, a growing community on Bend’s Westside. Patiently waiting, they spent three seasons as guests of the Tetherow Golf Club, enjoying the Scottish links style golf,

outstanding dining and a variety of social and family events. As the young family grew, so did their eagerness to live in such a convenient, growing area.
In 2011, the Williams family learned about Tetherow’s Jr. Executive Membership, which is available to those under 46 and includes a family membership to the Athletic Club of Bend for just $390 a month. It was the ideal opportunity to join Tetherow. When they saw an opportunity to purchase a beautiful homesite at a great price in late 2011, they realized they could build a home

and actually make their dream come true within the next year instead of having to wait!

The Club at Tetherow

“The entire staff is so cohesive and you can tell they really enjoy their jobs. It makes such a difference when the staff is happy at a Club. We also love the other families living there, and the views and prime location to everything Bend has to offer just can’t be beat,” said Williams.

New Construction at Tetherow

This budding community has experienced impressive growth the past 12 months. Tetherow welcomed 30 new families into the membership last year alone! With its ideal location – nestled between the Southwest edge of Bend and the Deschutes National Forest – the full Cascade Mountain views and award-winning golf, this renaissance is hardly a surprise.
Since January of 2011, 12 real estate contracts have been written, eight of which have closed with a property sale while the remaining four are pending. Construction begins on three custom homes between now and May. Additionally, local builders Greg Welch

and Ryan Duble are both designing showcase homes that will begin construction this spring. They will boast mountain and fairway views, and range from $599,000 to $775,000. With a blend of primary residences and second homes, Tetherow is growing in leaps and bounds.

Tripleknot Townhomes at Tetherow

Tetherow’s Tripleknot Townhomes, which are in the first stage of construction, have already sold the model and construction should be complete by April, when the golf course opens for play.


A variety of membership options are available at Tetherow, with or without real estate purchase. The David McLay Kidd course is open April through October, while the Tetherow Grill is open year round, seven days a week.

Contact us to arrange a tour of Tetherow.

Check out our Facebook business page.

You may also like -

Bend Oregon Real Estate Recovering (at long last)

Sandy and John Kohlmoos: Real Estate Agent in Bend, OR

Bend Oregon Real Estate Recovering

The new Bend Oregon real estate expert . . . Mackie

Bend real estate recovering

And interesting article by Elon Glucklich in The Bulletin states that a long-awaited real estate recovery in Bend may already be under way. The gist of the article appears below.

But don’t expect boom to return

On Friday, at The Riverhouse Convention Center, there was hope that tepid market conditions would gradually improve this year — but caution that homeowners, brokers and investors would have to brace for a “new normal” in the market.

“We’re on the verge of recovery”

“We’re on the verge of a recovery,” Ron Ross, principal broker at Compass Commercial Real Estate Services, told a crowd of about 200 business, real estate and financial officials. But “we can’t wait for the economy to get back to where it was in 2005. That’s not going to happen any time soon.

Homes in Bend . . . 1986 to 2004

Between 1986 and 2004, median home prices in Bend increased at an average yearly rate of 6.1 percent, Ross said, a healthy rate of growth that slightly outpaced national growth. But as the economy sped up in the years that followed, growth took off. Six percent increases soon blossomed into 16 percent value gains on average, between 2004 and 2007.

Spurred by population growth and a rise in demand, home prices rocketed upward. In 2006, median home prices in Bend crept toward $400,000, according to Central Oregon Association of Realtors data, up about 30 percent from 2005. “Then,” said Ross, “came 2008.”

By the end of 2009, Bend prices had dropped 68 percent from their 2007 value (I don’t think that’s right!)

By the fall of 2011, median home prices in Bend were at $212,000 (last month they were $186,000)

John Mitchell of M & H Economic Consultants

Mitchell shared several data points showing just how far the Bend real estate market has fallen from its highs.

About 22 percent of the nation’s homeowners are underwater,

owing more on their mortgages than their homes are worth, he said. Since the market tanked in 2008, $7 trillion in home equity has vanished.

“The American dream, for most people meant having their kids be better off than them,” he said. “Now, that’s not so sure. Kids are still living it home.”

But there are signs of recovery. Nationwide employment picked up in the second half of 2011 — Oregon added 20,000 jobs last year, after losing more than 100,000 in 2009. In December, the statewide seasonally adjusted unemployment rate dropped to 8.9 percent, the first time it had fallen below 9 percent in three years, according to the Oregon Employment Department.

Homes in Bend are cheaper than they’ve been in 9 years!

Interest rates near 4 percent are enticing first-time buyers to make offers on homes that are cheaper than they’ve been in nine years.

“Housing affordability is at record levels,” Mitchell said. At the start of 2012, “Median families have almost twice as much income to buy the median house.

“There may not be a better time to buy a home in Bend in my lifetime.”

“I’m going to say that winter of 2011 and 2012 marked the beginning of the housing recovery in Bend,” Ross said.

Search anonymously for one of those homes in Bend.

Check out Bend Oregon Real Estate on Facebook

You may also like -

Bend Oregon Homes For Sale

Sandy and John Kohlmoos: Real Estate Agent in Bend, OR

Homes for Sale in Bend . . . under $200,000

Post image for Homes for Sale in Bend . . . under $200,000


I was thinking a bit about the Bend real estate market (something I do quite frequently), and specifically about homes for sale in Bend. My interest was further piqued when I read an article in the Bend Bulletin (Median Price in Bend Drops for 4th Year in a Row). The article, while certainly based on fact, failed to convey recent trends and the palpable uptick in the market . . . especially with homes under $200,000.

2008 . . . Homes in Bend under $200,000

I took a step back, and arbitrarily picked a date . . . February of 2008 . . . just four years ago. My how the Bend real estate landscape has changed! In that month, just one home in Bend sold for less than $200,000.

And that home, a 651 square footer built in 1928, went for $199,500.

2011 . . . Homes in Bend under $200,000

The drop in median price in 2011 can be directly attributed to the huge number of homes which sold for under $200,000. Of the 1684 homes sold in Bend, fully 903, or 54%, were under the “Mendoza Line“. As of December, there was less than two months of for sale inventory at this price point!

Homes in Bend under $200,000 Today

Here is a sophisticated showcase of homes in Bend presently listed at under $200,000; just click on a thumbnail to see details for that home.

$199,900

Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201102067
$199,900
61409 Blakely Road
Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201200823
$199,900
434 NE Norton Ave
Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201109094
$199,900

Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201105539
$199,900

Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201108695
$199,900

Bend, OR 97707
Listing #: 201105042
$199,900

Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201200217
$199,900
17136 Wood Duck Ct
Bend, OR 97707
Listing #: 201105553
$199,500
20945 Marsh Orchid Ct
Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201201347
$199,000
4335 S Hwy 97
Bend, OR 97756
Listing #: 201109738
$198,000

Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201200153
$196,000
21049 Don St
Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201105197
$195,000

Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201108099
$195,000
55595 Wagon Master Way
Bend, OR 97707
Listing #: 201104367
$195,000

Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201103832
$195,000
65050 W Highway 20
Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201108307
$194,990
19705 Aspen Meadows Dr
Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201109543
$194,900

Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201105270
$194,900
60844 Windsor Dr
Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201201273
$194,500

Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201109514
$193,900
63268 Chaparrel Dr
Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201108399
$191,500
63431 Hughes
Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201108353
$191,100

Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201106772
$190,900

Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201109615
$189,900

Bend, OR 97707
Listing #: 201108047
$189,900
63105 Douglas Lane
Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201108954
$189,900

Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201108874
$189,900

Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201201271
$189,900
20886 King David Ave
Bend, OR 97702
Listing #: 201200646
$189,900
65286 73rd St
Bend, OR 97701
Listing #: 201109432

Click here to see all the homes in Bend listed for less than $200,000.What a great time to be a buyer!

Check out our Facebook Business page.

Contact me to find out more about the picture at the top of the post.

You may also like -

How Unemployment Numbers Cause Debate

Dave Woodland - Your Bend, OR Friendly, Knowledgable Mortgage Professional: Loan Officer in Bend, OR
The single-largest drag on our economy is housing. The biggest kitchen-table concern is underemployment and unemployment. The two are connected as homeowners’ ability to buy homes is out of reach with the worst-in-our-lifetime employment picture. So the news from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on Friday was more than welcome. A quarter million net private sector jobs created in the month was fantastic.

Improvement of unemployment to 8.3% is also good. Or is it? The out-of-work number is 12.7 million people. That is as large as the population of Pennsylvania, every man, woman and child in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia and everywhere in between. There was much celebrating going on Friday as the unemployment figure was announced. I saw claims of a 40-48 state sweep by President Obama in 2012 based on the improved number.

What? Yes, 8.3% is good compared to 9.1% where we were. Yes, 8.3% is good compared to the 8.5% economists predicted. But how does it feel to you? Do you see marked improvement in your neighborhood? Does it feel like we are moving out of the Great Recession? Let’s look at some numbers and what you will be hearing about for the next month until the BLS provides more numbers.

Let’s detail some percentages: 8.3%, 15.1%, 11.0%, 8.0%. Some numbers 1,177,000; 1,685,000; and another percentage 63.7%. These are numbers you will need to know to make heads or tails of the spins you will hear for the next number of weeks.

8.3%: January Unemployment published by the BLS after their monthly phone survey. One of the questions they ask is “Did you apply for a job during the time period between x and y?” If the answer is “No.” and you aren’t currently employed, you are considered not looking and not part of the employment work force. Remember that 8.3% is 12.7M people out of the153M who are either working or still looking/applying for work.

15.1%: This is the “Underemployed” or “U-6” number and takes into account those who are working part-time (PT) but want to be working full-time (FT). It also estimates those who are “marginally attached to the Labor Force”, i.e. would start looking again as soon as they can.

This 15.1% has improved from 17.3% a year ago and is still very high. The implication is that as the economy improves there are that many million more jobs needed to absorb the people looking. Remember that the net working population growth each month is approx 140,000. If only 127,000 jobs are created in a month, the Unemployment stays flat. The 8.8M jobs lost between January 2008 and February 2010 has been devastating.

To get back to healthy, we not only need to get a significant number of the Unemployed back to work, but also many of the ~3M PT employed who are wanting FT employment, plus many of the millions who have given up looking and are not part of the 8.3% and for some not even part of the 15.1%. Watch for OFA to use the chart up on the left with the down bars in red, blamed on Bush and the up bars in green attributed to the policies of this administration.

11.0%: today’s number of January Unemployed if the number of 2008 employees were all still in the game, at least looking for employment. Don't confuse this. Today's 8.3% is lower because so many are no longer looking. If you add those dropouts back in, as if they were still looking, the number would be 11% today.

8.0%: You will hear republican candidates calling out Pres. Obama for the 8.0% bright line he drew in the sand, an unemployment number he claimed when he touted the stimulus projects. You will hear Pres. Obama and Whitehouse Press Sec’y Jay Carney rebutting that his policies have led to the recovery from the worst part of the downturn (a downturn caused by the failed policies of his predecessor, btw.) You decide. Is it feeling like a recovery? Some will say yes and others will say no.

1,177,000 is the adjustment in January to the Labor Force. An adjustment was made to accommodate the 2010 census numbers and in the process it was determined that this many additional people are not in the workforce and not looking for work.

1,685,000 is the number added to the entire population of working age based on the 2010 census. Of this number 508,000 have found work or are looking and 1.2M are not in the Labor Force. Note that this number of people did not drop out in the month of January as some have reported, but are part to a catch up adjustment. There is some debate around the 1.2M number, but the truth still is that these need to be included in the millions who will need work if we are to bring the unemployment rate back to a healthy figure (closer to 5%).

63.7% is the participation percentage, meaning what percentage of the working-age* population is participating in the work force, either FT or PT employed. This number at 63.7% is down from a year ago at 64.2% and dropped 0.3 pts in January because of the adjustments just mentioned. The number has not been this low since 1984 and to some, this is the most concerning statistic. Will those long-term out of work be able to reengage in the workforce? BTW, *the working population is considered all 16 and up who are not on active duty or in an elderly, mental, or penal institution. That civilian worker number in January is 242M.

Another bright point from the BLS Jobs Report is that the unemployment rate amongst Iraq and Afghanistan Vets fell from 13.1 to 9.3%, still not low enough, but a nice movement in the right direction.

The impact on mortgage rates Friday was about an 1/8th of a percent. The market during the day today has already recovered more than half of that decrease. The very small net reaction in the market is an indicator that the bond buyers are not seeing this Unemployment “improvement” in the same light as the Whitehouse. The Fed is sticking by thei predictions last week that Unemployment will be between 8.2 and 8.5% on the year.

These days, more than ever, experience counts. We at Signet have spent our careers providing the best programs and the best customer service. You, your friends and clients deserve the best. We enjoy making exceptional real estate deals happen. Please let us call your friends and clients who could use expert advice. We are grateful to work with you.