“World's Most Complete Neighborpedia”
Explore:   What's happening in your neck of the woods?

About Shelby County, TN

Are the Realtor® Brand & NAR a National Conspiracy That Plunders It's Members, Restricts Free Trade & Desecrates Anti-Trust Laws ?

02-15-12
David Saks
David Saks: Real Estate Broker in Memphis, TN


Some believe that they are.

Why have hundreds of thousands of NAR members resigned ?

Quote: "The NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® has seen its membership decline 21 percent from its peak of 1.35 million members in 2006 to 1.06 million in 2010. The numbers will likely be down in 2011 as well."
Stacey Moncrieff, editor in chief for REALTOR® Magazine and managing director of publishing for the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®.
Realtor Magazine April 2011

It's now 2012 !

Are Licensees seeking work with non-NAR affiliated brokerages or quitting ?

Are non-NAR affiliated MLS's succeeding ?

Are REALTORS® losing credibility, ground and favor with the general public ?

Are REALTORS® being hammered by destructive media content and NAR portrayed as dangerous to consumers and the national economy ?

Do we awaken to press releases and comments that blackball and question the trustworthiness and believability of REALTORS®, everyday ?

Is NAR a predator pounding it's members for more and providing less ?

Some believe that it is.

The United States vs. The National Association of Realtors

LO'S CHARGED WITH FRAUD

02-15-12
David Saks
David Saks: Real Estate Broker in Memphis, TN

Two North County Loan Officers Charged in Scheme to Fraudulently Obtain Mortgages in Carlsbad and Siphon Nearly $1 Million in Bogus Fees

U.S. Attorney’s Office February 14, 2012
  • Southern District of California (619) 557-5610

United States Attorney Laura E. Duffy announced that Simon Saed Alizadeh was arraigned in federal court in San Diego today on an indictment charging Alizadeh and Kian Ashkanizadeh with conspiracy, wire fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering in connection with a mortgage fraud scheme involving four expensive homes on Triton Street in Carlsbad, California. The charges were returned by a federal grand jury on February 2, 2012. Co-defendant Ashkanizadeh was arraigned on the charges last week.

According to the indictment, the defendants, who worked at a mortgage company called Southern California Finance, recruited family members and friends to supply their names and signatures on mortgage loan applications as the purported buyers for these million-dollar homes. The defendants then fabricated the job titles, income, and assets of the purported buyers, so they could qualify for approximately $1 million in mortgage funding on each of the properties. The defendants arranged for $200,000 in sham “consulting fees” to come out of each transaction, and another $45,000 in fees for “construction fees”—but no consulting or construction was ever performed, according to the charges. Instead, the defendants took for themselves most of the extra $245,000 in fees paid out from each of the four transactions. According to the indictment, the defendants disguised the funds by first funneling the payments through bank accounts owned by friends and relatives, and then causing the funds to be withdrawn or transferred to their own bank accounts.

The defendants will next appear before United States District Judge Irma E. Gonzalez for a motion hearing on April 3, 2012, at 2:00 p.m.

Criminal Case No. 12CR0403-IEG

DEFENDANTS

Simon Saed Alizadeh Kian Ashkanizadeh

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

Count 1: Title 18, United States Code, Section 371—Conspiracy Maximum penalties: five years’ imprisonment, $250,000 fine or twice the gross pecuniary gain or twice the gross pecuniary loss (whichever is greatest), $100 special assessment, three years of supervised release

Count 2: Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341—Mail Fraud Maximum penalties: 20 years’ imprisonment, $250,000 fine or twice the gross pecuniary gain or twice the gross pecuniary loss (whichever is greatest), $100 special assessment, three years of supervised release

Counts 3-4: Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341—Wire Fraud Maximum penalties: 20 years’ imprisonment, $250,000 fine or twice the gross pecuniary gain or twice the gross pecuniary loss (whichever is greatest), $100 special assessment, three years of supervised release

Counts 5-8: Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(1)(B)(i)—Money Laundering Maximum penalties: 20 years’ imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction (whichever is greatest), $100 special assessment, three years of supervised release

INVESTIGATING AGENCY

Federal Bureau of Investigation

An indictment itself is not evidence that the defendants committed the crimes charged. The defendants are presumed innocent until the government meets its burden in court of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Courtesy FBI

THREE LOAN MOD SWINDLERS PLEAD GUILTY

02-15-12
David Saks
David Saks: Real Estate Broker in Memphis, TN

Operators of Mortgage Loan Modification Business Plead Guilty to Conspiracy to Commit Fraud

U.S. Attorney’s Office February 14, 2012
  • Southern District of California (619) 557-5610

SAN DIEGO, CA—Three individuals charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and mail fraud for their roles in operating a fraudulent mortgage loan modification business pled guilty today in federal court in San Diego, announced United States Attorney for the Southern District of California Laura E. Duffy. According to the plea agreements, Ziad Nabil Mohammed Al Saffar and Sara Beth Bushore Rosengrant admitted that they operated the fraudulent loan audit and modification business, located in San Diego, California, under the names “Compliance Audit Solutions, Inc.” (“CAS”) and CAS Group, Inc., (“CAS Group”). Daniel Al Saffar admitted that he worked as a sales representative in connection with the operation.

According to court documents, the defendants targeted homeowners who were unable to afford their mortgage payments and falsely advertised to them that CAS and CAS Group were affiliated with the federal government. The defendants admitted to using false and fraudulent statements and representations to induce customers to purchase an “audit” of their home mortgage loans, supposedly to identify “violations” in the loan documents that could then be used to force banks to renegotiate their loans. The audit fees ranged from $995 to $3,500.

According to court records, among the misrepresentations made to customers were claims that CAS and CAS Group were affiliated with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), that they were participating in a federal program called “Hope for Homeowners,” that the audit fees were tax deductible, and that CAS and CAS Group had an “attorney” on staff who could finalize negotiations with banks on behalf of homeowners. The indictment further alleged that, as part of the conspiracy, the defendants fraudulently induced certain homeowners to make payments to CAS or CAS Group by falsely promising that such “good faith” payments were necessary to reduce their loan balance and interest rate, and that those payments would be kept in an “escrow account” by CAS or CAS Group. The false representations also included telling homeowners that banks demanded a “settlement fee” in order to modify a first mortgage and eliminate a second mortgage; that a one-time payment to cover taxes and insurance on the property was needed; and that the homeowners should make their monthly mortgage payments to CAS or CAS Group, instead of to their lender, and that the funds would be held in an escrow account for the benefit of a new lender.

As part of their plea agreements, defendants agreed to pay restitution to the victims of their criminal conduct to be determined by the court. Each defendant also agreed to make a restitution payment in an amount of $30,000 prior to the sentencing hearing. Today’s guilty pleas are subject to final acceptance by United States District Court Judge Anthony J. Battaglia at or before sentencing. The sentencing hearing is scheduled on April 27, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., before Judge Battaglia.

This case is the product of an investigation by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Office of the Special Inspector General-Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and is being prosecuted in San Diego federal court by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph S. Green.

Local victims of mortgage fraud may report it at the Internet Crime Complaint Center, ic3.gov or call the FBI at (858) 565-1255. To read the latest FBI mortgage fraud report visit www.fbi.gov.

This case was brought in coordination with the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, which was established to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement working together to launch a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.

The Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program co-chairs the task force’s Rescue Fraud Working Group. For more information on the task force, visit www.StopFraud.gov. Advice from federally approved housing counselors is free, as are mortgage modifications under Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). For more information, visit www.makinghomeaffordable.gov. SIGTARP investigates fraud, waste, and abuse in connection with TARP. To report suspected illicit activity involving TARP, dial the SIGTARP Hotline at 1-877-744-2009.

Courtesy FBI

REALTOR PLEADS GUILTY TO BANKRUPTCY FRAUD

02-15-12
David Saks
David Saks: Real Estate Broker in Memphis, TN

Raleigh Realtor Pleads Guilty to Bankruptcy Fraud

U.S. Attorney’s Office February 15, 2012
  • Eastern District of North Carolina (919) 856-4530

NEW BERN—United States Attorney Thomas G. Walker announced that in federal court yesterday GARY KEVIN COATS, pled guilty before United States Magistrate Judge David W. Daniel to bankruptcy fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 157(3).

According to the criminal information filed on December 20, 2011, COATS filed a voluntary petition for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy on February 10, 2009. A Chapter 7 Trustee was appointed and COATS, then a licensed realtor and operator of Featured Properties, LLC, was notified by an Order and Notice to Debtor that all property belonged to the Chapter 7 estate. This property included a Raleigh condominium to which COATS had declared he intended to surrender.

In March, 2009, COATS was contacted by a realtor who represented clients wishing to purchase the condo. In April, 2009, COATS, using the buyers’ assumed name and forged signatures and initials, submitted an offer to the Trustee to purchase the condo. Over the next couple of weeks, COATS, using the assumed name, through e-mails, encouraged the Trustee to take the buyers’ offer. In May, 2009, the Trustee filed a motion to approve the private sale with the United States Bankruptcy Court. Unbeknownst to the Trustee, the buyers’ realtor and COATS had negotiated a side agreement that the buyers would pay additional funds to COATS outside of closing that would not go to the Trustee. On June 5, 2009, the Trustee contacted the closing attorney and learned of the side agreement. On June 10, 2009, COATS, posing as an attorney, e-mailed the realtor regarding a cease and desist letter sent to COATS under his assumed name concerning the side agreement. Later that month, the attorney whose name had been used by COATS, contacted the Trustee notifying the Trustee that he did not e-mail the realtor nor did he know COATS.

COATS will be sentenced in 90 days.

Investigation of this case was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant United States Attorney S. Katherine Burnette is prosecuting the case.

Courtesy FBI

RATINGS ON MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES LEADS TO LAWSUIT

02-15-12
David Saks
David Saks: Real Estate Broker in Memphis, TN

Ratings on Mortgage-Backed Securities Leads to Lawsuit

Standard & Poor is the subject of a civil lawsuit for its fraudulent role in assigning its highest ratings to risky mortgage-backed investments in the years leading up to the housing market crash.

The complaint alleges that Standard & Poor's, or S&P, compromised its independence as a ratings agency by doling out high ratings to unworthy, risky investments as a corporate strategy to increase its revenue and market share. S&P ignored the increasing risks posed by mortgage-backed securities, instead giving the investment pools ratings that were favorable to its investment bank client base and S&P's profits.

The lawsuit cites numerous internal emails and conversations among S&P employees in the run up to the housing market's crash that demonstrate the company misrepresented its ratings as objective and independent. In one such exchange, in April 2007, an online conversation via a company-based instant messenger application revealed employees discussing S&P ratings compared to the reality of risk involved, with an employee stating an investment "could be structured by cows and we would rate it."

Investors relied on S&P ratings because they were historically rooted in the agency's purported independence and objectivity. S&P's internal code of conduct states its goal to "promote investor protection by safeguarding the integrity of the rating process." But, the lawsuit cites congressional testimony by a former managing director of S&P who revealed that "profits were running the show," with ratings being assigned to risky investments to help drive profit margins for their clients.

S&P, a subsidiary of McGraw-Hill Companies, is one of the nation's largest credit ratings agencies responsible for independently rating risk on behalf of clients and investors. Madigan said in the run up to the financial crisis, S&P consistently misrepresented the risk of mortgage-backed securities, assigning these securities its highest seal of approval – or AAA rating. This misrepresentation spurred investors to purchase securities that were far riskier than their ratings revealed.

Mortgage-backed securities are financial products made up of a pool of mortgages that are bundled together and sold as a security. The assets are backed by residential mortgages, including subprime mortgages. The performance of these investment products have significant, real-world implications for Illinois institutional investors, such as pension funds and 401(k) managers that make decisions about whether, and which, of these securities are appropriate investments. It was the misrepresentation of the true value of these risky mortgage pools that helped the housing market skyrocket and ultimately led to its collapse in 2008.

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan filed the lawsuit.

"Publically, S&P took every opportunity to proclaim their analyses and ratings as independent, objective and free from its desire for revenue," Madigan said. "Yet privately, S&P abandoned its principles and instead used every trick possible to give deals high ratings in order to retain clients and generate revenue. The mortgage-backed securities that helped our market soar – and ultimately crash – could not have been purchased by most investors without S&P's seal of approval."

The lawsuit is part of Attorney General Madigan's continuing work to hold lenders accountable for their unlawful financial misconduct, and to provide relief and assistance to Illinois families struggling to save their homes. Most recently, in December 2011, Madigan and the U.S. Department of Justice reached a $335 million settlement with Countrywide, a subsidiary of Bank of America, for discriminating against thousands of Illinois borrowers of color during the height of the subprime mortgage lending spree. The settlement will provide restitution to harmed Illinois borrowers and is the largest settlement of a fair lending lawsuit ever obtained by a state attorney general. The Attorney General is litigating a similar lawsuit against Wells Fargo alleging widespread discrimination against African American and Latino borrowers.

Madigan led an earlier lawsuit against Countrywide, which resulted in a nationwide $8.7 billion settlement in 2008 over the company's predatory lending practices. The Attorney General also reached a $39.5 million settlement with Wells Fargo over the bank's deceptive marketing of extremely risky loans called Pay Option ARMs, and in 2006, Madigan obtained more than $10 million in restitution for Illinois homeowners as part of a $325 million multi-state settlement with Ameriquest over the former mortgage giant's deceptive sales of predatory subprime mortgages.

Assistant Attorneys General Vaishali Rao and Vijay Raghavan are handling the case for Madigan's Consumer Fraud Bureau.

Courtesy Mortgage Fraud Blog